2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017ja025107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Hindcast Experiments of the 2009 Sudden Stratospheric Warming in WACCMX+DART

Abstract: The ability to perform data assimilation in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model eXtended version (WACCMX) is implemented using the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART) ensemble adjustment Kalman filter. Results are presented demonstrating that WACCMX+DART analysis fields reproduce the middle and upper atmosphere variability during the 2009 major sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) event. Compared to specified dynamics WACCMX, which constrains the meteorology by nudging toward an external reanalysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
136
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
136
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith‐Johnsen et al () showed better agreement with observations when D region chemistry was added to the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) but the NO underestimate persisted between 90 and 110 km. Recent studies have shown that either constraining the model up to 90 km or assimilating mesospheric data improves the representation of the EPP IE (Pedatella, Liu, et al, ; Sassi et al, ; Siskind et al, ). In the Antarctic, Hendrickx et al () show EPP‐NO x underestimates despite MLT descent rates in WACCM that agree with observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith‐Johnsen et al () showed better agreement with observations when D region chemistry was added to the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) but the NO underestimate persisted between 90 and 110 km. Recent studies have shown that either constraining the model up to 90 km or assimilating mesospheric data improves the representation of the EPP IE (Pedatella, Liu, et al, ; Sassi et al, ; Siskind et al, ). In the Antarctic, Hendrickx et al () show EPP‐NO x underestimates despite MLT descent rates in WACCM that agree with observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in middle and upper atmospheric modeling have led to self‐consistent, coupled numerical models of the global stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere, and ionosphere that can generally incorporate the day‐to‐day variability in lower and middle atmospheric wave activity by constraining the relevant dynamical fields using observational and/or reanalysis data sets. Typically, observational data sets are incorporated into physics‐based models through data assimilation (DA; e.g., Codrescu et al, ; Fuller‐Rowell et al, ; Matsuo et al, ; Pedatella et al, ; Sutton, ; H. Wang et al, , and references therein), while reanalysis data sets are incorporated into physics‐based models via nudging. More formally nudging is referred to as Newtonian relaxation, where model fields are relaxed using a user‐specified time constant (e.g., Liu et al, ; Marsh, ; Smith, Pedatella, et al, ; Siskind & Drob, ; J. C. Wang et al, , and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated that DA can correct most model bias during storm times via assimilating TEC into the model and optimizing multiple state variables. Pedatella et al (2018) applied EnKF to a whole atmosphere model recently and achieved reasonable ionospheric TEC forecast during stratospheric sudden warming events. Pedatella et al (2018) applied EnKF to a whole atmosphere model recently and achieved reasonable ionospheric TEC forecast during stratospheric sudden warming events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hsu et al (2018) did several observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) based on the Ensemble Square Root Filter (EnSRF) for COSMIC-2 observations and concluded that the assimilation of slant TEC data from COSMIC-2 can considerably improve the global ionospheric specification and prediction. However, in these above studies, the authors usually applied the commonly used software packages to implement EnKF/EnSRF, including the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (Hsu et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2002) and the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (Anderson et al, 2009;Chartier et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2012;Matsuo et al, 2013;Pedatella et al, 2018), which rely on large-scale parallel high-performance computing systems. However, in these above studies, the authors usually applied the commonly used software packages to implement EnKF/EnSRF, including the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (Hsu et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2002) and the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (Anderson et al, 2009;Chartier et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2012;Matsuo et al, 2013;Pedatella et al, 2018), which rely on large-scale parallel high-performance computing systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation