2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and design of spatial compliant mechanisms using a 3-D dynamic stiffness model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any number of piezoelectric stacks connected to compliant mechanisms in serial-parallel configurations can be considered without a loss of generality. Compliant mechanisms with distributed and lumped compliance including rigid bodies and lumped mass can also be involved [53,54]. The following performances are concerned: (a) the intrinsically static and dynamic characteristics, such as the displacement amplification ratio, cross-axis/parasitic motion errors, input and output stiffness and natural frequencies; (b) the responses of mechanical displacement and electrical impedance on the frequency domain; and (c) the time-domain response including piezoelectric hysteresis and dynamic bandwidth of the power amplifier.…”
Section: Systematic Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any number of piezoelectric stacks connected to compliant mechanisms in serial-parallel configurations can be considered without a loss of generality. Compliant mechanisms with distributed and lumped compliance including rigid bodies and lumped mass can also be involved [53,54]. The following performances are concerned: (a) the intrinsically static and dynamic characteristics, such as the displacement amplification ratio, cross-axis/parasitic motion errors, input and output stiffness and natural frequencies; (b) the responses of mechanical displacement and electrical impedance on the frequency domain; and (c) the time-domain response including piezoelectric hysteresis and dynamic bandwidth of the power amplifier.…”
Section: Systematic Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If piezoelectric stacks are not considered, the above modeling process will degenerate into a similar dynamic stiffness matrix modeling procedure for compliant mechanisms in [52][53][54]. By solving the linear equation sets in equation (22) with the dynamic frequency ω = 0 and without the consideration of piezoelectric stacks, the kinetostatic performances of the solely compliant mechanism, such as the displacement amplification ratio, parasitic/cross-axis motion errors as well as input and output stiffness can be easily calculated.…”
Section: Systematic Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many modeling methods for analyzing compliant mechanisms as reviewed in the literature of [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], including Castigliano’s second theorem, elastic beam theory, compliance matrix modeling (CMM) method, finite element method, pseudo-rigid-body (PRB) method, the chained beam constraint model and the 3-D dynamic stiffness model. Both merits and shortcomings were comprehensively reported.…”
Section: Modeling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited discretenode function values in the workspace are adopted to evaluate the objective performance (global performance index, GPI) due to the difficulty in obtaining its analytical expressions in the workspace. It significantly increases the performance index evaluation's computational cost (Lian et al, 2017). Therefore, effective multi-objective optimization design is challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%