2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.649508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Classification of Word Co-Occurrence Networks From Alzheimer’s Patients and Controls

Abstract: In this paper we construct word co-occurrence networks from transcript data of controls and patients with potential Alzheimer’s disease using the ADReSS challenge dataset of spontaneous speech. We examine measures of the structure of these networks for significant differences, finding that networks from Alzheimer’s patients have a lower heterogeneity and centralization, but a higher edge density. We then use these measures, a network embedding method and some measures from the word frequency distribution to cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second set of studies (Karlekar et al, 2018;Orimaye et al, 2018;Fritsch et al, 2019;Pan et al, 2019;Balagopalan et al, 2021;Guo et al, 2021;Meghanani et al, 2021) used deep learning methods, of which the best accuracy was 91.1% (Karlekar et al, 2018). The rest of the studies (Yuan et al, 2020;Pranav and Veeky, 2021;Roshanzamir et al, 2021;Tristan and Saturnino Analysis, 2021) used deep learning models in combination with acoustic features or linguistic features. The study by Yuan et al (2020) obtained the best accuracy of 89.6%, the highest in Interspeech 2020.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second set of studies (Karlekar et al, 2018;Orimaye et al, 2018;Fritsch et al, 2019;Pan et al, 2019;Balagopalan et al, 2021;Guo et al, 2021;Meghanani et al, 2021) used deep learning methods, of which the best accuracy was 91.1% (Karlekar et al, 2018). The rest of the studies (Yuan et al, 2020;Pranav and Veeky, 2021;Roshanzamir et al, 2021;Tristan and Saturnino Analysis, 2021) used deep learning models in combination with acoustic features or linguistic features. The study by Yuan et al (2020) obtained the best accuracy of 89.6%, the highest in Interspeech 2020.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer the RQ4, we ran a word co-occurrence analysis in Sci2 on the Title of publications. Word co-occurrence network is widely used in studies to identify and study the structure of researches on a theme (Garg and Kumar, 2018; Millington and Luz, 2021; Veling and Van Der Weerd, 1999). First, we conducted a topical analysis to remove the tokenized, lower stem and stopwords from the title.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural extension of our work is to include the timing information as per Mirheidari et al ( 19 ). Other notable studies process participant transcripts from the Cookie Theft Task using natural language processing methodologies to train classifiers to similar ends as Mirheidari et al ( 26 , 27 ). These studies use co-occurrence and semantic similarity representations gleaned from transcripts, with content information units and other linguistic features to improve classification of patient transcripts as healthy/control or MCI/AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%