2020
DOI: 10.1108/md-12-2019-1732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the voice of customers by a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach in a developing country's automotive market

Abstract: PurposeThis paper analyses the voice of customers (VoCs) using a hybrid clustering multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. The proposed method serves as an efficient tool for how to approach multiple decision-making involving a large set of countrywide customer complaints in the Iranian automotive sector.Design/methodology/approachThe countrywide data comprising 3,342 customer complaints (VoCs) were gathered. A total of seven determinant complaint criteria were identified in brainstorming sessions with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Amoozad Mahdiraji et al (2020), a good brand image can increase consumer brand loyalty, trust, and also the intention to buy products from the brands they trust. Therefore, brand image has a direct influence on product sales volume (Lutfie & Marcelino, 2020).…”
Section: Brand Image On Purchasing Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Amoozad Mahdiraji et al (2020), a good brand image can increase consumer brand loyalty, trust, and also the intention to buy products from the brands they trust. Therefore, brand image has a direct influence on product sales volume (Lutfie & Marcelino, 2020).…”
Section: Brand Image On Purchasing Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a basic conceptual model is not available and access to hard data is limited, using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are very popular. Generally, MCDM approaches are applicable to address different research objectives encompassing measuring the importance of factors/criteria, ranking alternatives and analysing the relationship among factors (Amoozad Mahdiraji et al , 2020). Based on the benefits of the DEMATEL method and according to the literature review, the DEMATEL method has been widely used to investigate the causal relationships of key barriers based on the collective opinions of experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors' weights resulted from the fuzzy Delphi method are usually close to each other; thus, the distinction power of the criteria is not measured clearly. Moreover, the fuzzy Delphi method does not provide a priority list to rank these capabilities/factors according to their relative importance (Mahdiraji et al, 2020). The authors; therefore, introduced a hybrid BWM-Delphi weight to calculate the weights of these capabilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is preferred that the value of CR for each expert result is less than 0.2. Higher values are not recommended, and the expert should fill the questionnaire again or be replaced by another possible expert (Amoozad Mahdiraji et al, 2019Mahdiraji et al, , 2020. In this study, three focus groups were required to fill in the questionnaire for the second time.…”
Section: Global Collaborative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%