Analysing the link between public transport use and airborne transmission: mobility and contagion in the London underground

Abstract

BackgroundThe transmission of infectious diseases is dependent on the amount and nature of contacts between infectious and healthy individuals. Confined and crowded environments that people visit in their day-to-day life (such as town squares, business districts, transport hubs, etc) can act as hot-spots for spreading disease. In this study we explore the link between the use of public transport and the spread of airborne infections in urban environments.MethodsWe study a large number of journeys on the London Underground, which is known to be particularly crowded at certain times. We use publically available Oyster card data (the electronic ticket used for public transport in Greater London), to infer passengers’ routes on the underground network. In order to estimate the spread of a generic airborne disease in each station, we use and extend an analytical microscopic model that was initially designed to study people moving in a corridor.ResultsComparing our results with influenza-like illnesses (ILI) data collected by Public Health England (PHE) in London boroughs, shows a correlation between the use of public transport and the spread of ILI. Specifically, we show that passengers departing from boroughs with higher ILI rates have higher number of contacts when travelling on the underground. Moreover, by comparing our results with other demographic key factors, we are able to discuss the role that the Underground plays in the spread of airborne infections in the English capital.ConclusionsOur study suggests a link between public transport use and infectious diseases transmission and encourages further research into that area. Results could be used to inform the development of non-pharmacological interventions that can act on preventing instead of curing infections and are, potentially, more cost-effective.

The Subways Seeded the Massive Coronavirus Epidemic in New York City

“…Quite apart from the present study and the above-cited work by Goscé and colleagues (Gosce, Barton, andJohansson 2014, Gosce andJohansson 2018), a few other researchers have attempted to test whether public transport has served as a critical vehicle for the propagation of contagious respiratory diseases (Sun et al 2013, Troko et al 2011, Cooley et al 2011. One distinguishing factor between the present study and prior work is that seasonal influenza has generally had a reproductive number R in the range of 1.2-1.4, while pandemic influenza has had an R in the range of 1.4-1.8, with the high end representing the 1918 pandemic (Biggerstaff et al 2014).…”

“…The model was borrowed from the basic law of mass action in chemistry, where S and I molecules bombard against each other, bounding around in a gas or a liquid. In an innovative series of papers, Goscé and colleagues generalized this model to consider contagion when the S's and I's move along a corridor (Gosce, Barton, andJohansson 2014, Gosce andJohansson 2018). They applied their framework to the study of the spread of influenza-like illness in the London Underground, a vast network opened just nine years after Dr. John Snow got public officials to disable a pump at Broad (now Broadwick) and Lexington Streets, now about a five-minute walk from the Oxford Circus station.…”

Environmental and Health Effects of Ventilation in Subway Stations: A Literature Review

“…Review and analysis according to the literature[5,[8][9][10][11][12][14][15][16][17][18][26][27][28][29][30][31].Int. J. Environ.…”

Spread of COVID-19, Meteorological Conditions and Air Quality in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina: Two Facets Observed during Its Pandemic Lockdown

“…Our study shows that exposure to air pollution is significantly correlated with an increased risk of infection and death due to COVID-19 (as shown in Table 1). In addition, human mobility restriction measures provide the greatest benefit for COVID-19 mitigation [62,63], because prevention is actually more cost-effective than cure [64][65][66] or death [67]. Therefore, the results of this study show that air pollution in CABA can serve as one of the indicators to assess vulnerability to COVID-19.…”