Analysing the causes of corruption in the Malaysian construction industry

Abstract

Purpose Corruption continues to be a pervasive stain on the construction industry in developing countries worldwide, jeopardising project performance and with wide-ranging negative implications for all facets of society. As such, this study aims to identify and analyse the causes of corruption in the construction sector of an emerging economy such as Malaysia, as it is crucial to uncover the specific facilitating factors involved to devise effective counter strategies. Design/methodology/approach Following a detailed literature review, 18 causes of corruption are identified. The results of an opinion survey within the Malaysian construction industry are further reported to rank and analyse the causes. The factor analysis technique is then applied to uncover the principal factors involved. Findings The results indicate that all the considered causes are perceived to be significant, with the most critical causes being avarice, relationships between parties, lack of ethical standards, an intense competitive nature and the involvement of a large amount of money. A factor analysis reveals four major causal dimensions of these causes, comprising the unique nature of the construction industry and the extensive competition involved; unscrupulous leadership, culture and corruption perception; a flawed legal system and lack of accountability; and ineffective enforcement and an inefficient official bureaucracy. Research limitations/implications The study presents the Malaysian construction industry’s view of the causes of corruption. Therefore, the arguments made in the study are influenced by the social, economic and cultural settings of Malaysia, which may limit generalisation of the findings. Practical implications This paper helps stakeholders understand the root causes and underlying dimensions of corruption in the construction industry, especially in Malaysia. Recommendations for changing cultures that may be conducive to corrupt practices, and anti-corruption measures, are suggested based on the findings of the research. Originality/value These findings can guide practitioners and researchers in addressing the impediments that give rise to the vulnerability of the construction industry to corrupt practices and understanding the “red flags” in project delivery.

Critical analysis of pandemic impact on AEC organizations: the COVID-19 case

“…For example, this study's local construction market has a demandsupply gap even before the pandemic (Ebekozien et al, 2020). Also, younger economies tend to have a more intense competitive nature, resulting in vulnerable construction markets (Yap et al, 2020). These results further explain the necessity to understand better the pandemic impact encountered in specific countries to develop better pandemic responses that address the local pandemic impact.…”

Assessing the expected current and future competencies of quantity surveyors in the Malaysian built environment

“…In investigating the skills for procurement management, Oke et al (2018) categorise interpersonal skills as analytical operational skills. Understanding the interpersonal dynamics of the team is a critical attribute for enhancing open communication (Yap et al , 2020a, b) and engendering effective teamwork (Adu and Opawole, 2019). Townsend et al (2020, pp.…”

“…In addition to being equipped with technical knowledge, QSs have to effectively communicate and deal with people (Dada and Jagboro, 2012). For there to be efficient teamwork, communication has to be at its best (Yap et al , 2020b). Negotiation is a regular part of a surveyor's work (RICS, 2018).…”

“…Intriguingly, the contractor practitioners tend to perceive the requirements of ethical thinking as less significant than do their client and consultant counterparts. The construction industry is highly susceptible to various forms of corrupt practices such as bribery, nepotism, kickbacks and collusion (Yap, Lee, et al, 2020). The potential to engage in corruption can be explained using 'fraud triangle' theory, which comprises of three elements of opportunities (forms of corruption), pressure for corruption and rationale for corruption (Bowen et al, 2012).…”

Public Contracts in Holding Companies Operating in the Construction Industry – A Case of the Czech Republic

“…As stated by Ochrana and Maaytová (2012), there are -for the Czech Republic -estimates that losses due to nontransparent and corruptive behaviour amount to 10% of the volume of public procurements, showing that in the case of the construction industry the percentage is even higher. The problem of corruption in the area of public procurement and its negative influence is generally and globally acknowledged (see, for instance, study by Yap et al (2020), Owusu et al (2019) and references to the expert literature stated therein).…”