2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing serial data for mastitis detection by means of local regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other published results obtained higher SENS with low SPEC (Zecconi et al 2004;Cavero et al 2008). High SENS and SPEC have been published for clinical and subclinical mastitis in cows using the increases above moving average (Mele et al 2001;Cavero et al 2007), Tracking Signal Method (De Mol et al 1999Mele et al 2001) or Fuzzy Models (Cavero et al 2006) that combine one or more variables (for example, temperature, flow or yield) with EC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other published results obtained higher SENS with low SPEC (Zecconi et al 2004;Cavero et al 2008). High SENS and SPEC have been published for clinical and subclinical mastitis in cows using the increases above moving average (Mele et al 2001;Cavero et al 2007), Tracking Signal Method (De Mol et al 1999Mele et al 2001) or Fuzzy Models (Cavero et al 2006) that combine one or more variables (for example, temperature, flow or yield) with EC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studied methods for cow mastitis detection using EC are based on processing data from EC sensors located at short milk tube or claw (also at gland level) and applying algorithms that consider the comparison of gland EC with the moving average of previous milkings (Lansberger et al 1994;Mele et al 2001;Biggadike et al 2002;Zecconi et al 2004;Cavero et al 2007; Kamphuis et al 2008a) and the comparison of EC of collateral glands (Maatje et al 1992(Maatje et al , 1997Lien et al 2005). In all these studies, specificity (SPEC) was around 90%, but sensitivity (SENS) was lower (different results were obtained depending on the study and type of mastitis: clinical, subclinical or somatic cell count (SCC) increases, from 25 to 89%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…genetic selection for maximum milk yield) also play an important role in its etiology [4][5][6]. Mastitis leads to many adverse consequences including reduced milk yield, changes in milk quality which render it unsuitable for sale, shortened productive life of the cow and lower immunity to other diseases, premature culling, and increased labor, diagnosis, veterinary and medicine costs [7][8][9][10][11]. Considerable fi nancial savings can be made by preventing mastitis and treating infected animals effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflamed mammary glands, also known as bovine mastitis, lead to considerable growth in the number of such cells. This biologic process causes economic losses to the dairy industry, once it affects the milk quality (Cavero et al, 2007). The National Mastitis Council (Bramely et al, 1996) estimated annual losses per cow in the U.S. of US$ 185.00 due to mastitis, and a total annual expenditure of US$ 1.8 billion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems like these, together with artificial intelligence algorithms (AI), provide data that allow early detection of mastitis. For instance, Cavero et al (2007) and Miekley et al (2012) implemented a detection system based on univariate indicator variables, whereas Kamphuis et al (2010) applied decision trees to the problem. Cavero et al (2008) and Ankinakatte et al (2013) have also developed systems based on neural networks, whereas De Mol and Woldt (2001), Cavero et al (2006) and Kramer et al (2009) devise a system based on fuzzy logic, and finally, Miekley et al (2013) are vulnerable to noise, which has a considerable influence on the characteristics of the signal to be processed and the detection technique to be applied (Kamphuis et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%