The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods
DOI: 10.4135/9781446268261.n28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing Longitudinal Studies with Non-response: Issues and Statistical Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both adjustment strategies assume MAR. Under MI, there are several different approaches appropriate to the type of data and/or data structure (Carpenter & Plewis, 2011). In this paper we demonstrate that analyses which draw upon the longitudinal history of the cohort require strategies to use all of the available data, including any partial information (incomplete wave responses).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both adjustment strategies assume MAR. Under MI, there are several different approaches appropriate to the type of data and/or data structure (Carpenter & Plewis, 2011). In this paper we demonstrate that analyses which draw upon the longitudinal history of the cohort require strategies to use all of the available data, including any partial information (incomplete wave responses).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to tackle these problems and make best use of all of the available data in any analysis it becomes necessary to make assumptions about how a proportion of our data came to be missing at all. Many authors (for example Carpenter & Plewis, 2011) term this process to be 'the missingness mechanism'. Following Rubin (1976), Little and Rubin (2002), Carpenter and Plewis (2011) and others we adopt a typology of missingness mechanisms described as 'missing completely at random' (MCAR), 'missing at random' (MAR) and 'missing not at random' (MNAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations