Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4605-7_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of Urans and Les Capabilities to Predict Vortex Shedding for Rods and Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17) is overestimated as compared with the experimental value of 0.2 [1]. The same observation is made by Ferrand et al [10] with similar URANS Fig. 15 Velocity field in the centre plane for the two URANS models, using two different discharges at t ¼ 100 s simulations.…”
Section: Implication For Fish Resting Zonesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17) is overestimated as compared with the experimental value of 0.2 [1]. The same observation is made by Ferrand et al [10] with similar URANS Fig. 15 Velocity field in the centre plane for the two URANS models, using two different discharges at t ¼ 100 s simulations.…”
Section: Implication For Fish Resting Zonesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For Q ¼ 10 L/s the wake is almost steady, which might be explained by the low waterdepth and therefore by the influence of the bed. For the same Reynolds number, Ferrand et al [10] showed that URANS simulations are able to reproduce the von Karman vortex street. to find out whether the oscillation can be related to this phenomenon, the lateral velocity at the centreline and X=D ¼ 2 is treated with a Welch's method plus Hanning window.…”
Section: Implication For Fish Resting Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all of the inherent deficiencies of RANS described above, it is the only practical choice for the numerical simulation of separated vortical flows in engineering. At present there are some encouraging progresses for URANS approach [1][2][3]. It is well known that a significant development in the turbulence modeling theory since the 1990s is the nonlinear eddy viscosity turbulence model (NLEVM), which is essentially equivalent to the explicit algebraic stress model (EASM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%