2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1420-2530(16)30038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyse Préliminaire des Qualités Psychométriques d’une Version Française du Work Design Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ergonomics items obtained through EFA refer to "comfort" and they are very narrow in scope (if compared to the French literature on ergonomics, for instance). Ultimately, the third item in the ergonomics subcategory was eliminated to keep the structure of the measure as close to the original as possible, leaving only two items, as in the French version of the WDQ (Bigot et al, 2014). The resulting subcategory was labeled "comfort at work."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ergonomics items obtained through EFA refer to "comfort" and they are very narrow in scope (if compared to the French literature on ergonomics, for instance). Ultimately, the third item in the ergonomics subcategory was eliminated to keep the structure of the measure as close to the original as possible, leaving only two items, as in the French version of the WDQ (Bigot et al, 2014). The resulting subcategory was labeled "comfort at work."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second (18-factor model) was identified as the most promising model in Study 1. The final model tested (21-factor model) was identified as the best in the original WDQ study and was adopted as a reference in adaptations made in other countries (Bayona et al, 2015;Bigot et al, 2014;Fernández Rios et al, 2017;Stegmann et al, 2010). All items of each major category were included in the 4-factor test, following Fernández Rios et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.75. The second variable assessed workplace ergonomics using an adapted version of the workplace ergonomics subscale of the Work Design Questionnaire (Bigot et al, ). This subscale was composed of three items (e.g., “In my dental practice, the furniture and equipment are suitable and user‐friendly”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third variable referred to the work area. We used an adapted subscale of the Work Design Questionnaire (Bigot et al, ) with three items (e.g., “My dental practice is comfortable in terms of temperature and humidity”). Responses were made on a 7‐point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Recent research (e.g Bigot et al 2014. reported adequate psychometric properties for both of these subscales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%