2019
DOI: 10.1109/jeds.2019.2934575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analog Performance and its Variability in Sub-10 nm Fin-Width FinFETs: a Detailed Analysis

Abstract: This paper discusses in detail the effects of Sub-10nm fin-width (W fin ) on the analog performance and variability of FinFETs. It is observed through detailed measurements that the transconductance degrades and output conductance improves with the reduction in fin-width. Through different analog performance metrics, it is shown that analog circuit performance, in Sub-10nm W fin regime, cannot be improved just by W fin scaling but by optimizing source/drain resistance, gate dielectric thickness together with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To look insight into the effect of gate configuration, we first study Ψ(z) in a 6.5 nm (10 layer) thick MoS2 channel under varied SG and DG configurations, where the channel is encapsulated by two 10 nm thick dielectrics with a εr of 10 and the both dielectrics are covered with metallic gates. Figure 1a shows Ψ(z) of channel electrons at ns = 5×10 12 cm −2 and corresponding potential profile V(z) of the device under the SG configuration. In such a configuration, the channel and top gate (TG) are electrically grounded while the bottom gate (BG) is biased with a positive voltage VBG, as shown in the inset.…”
Section: Methods and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To look insight into the effect of gate configuration, we first study Ψ(z) in a 6.5 nm (10 layer) thick MoS2 channel under varied SG and DG configurations, where the channel is encapsulated by two 10 nm thick dielectrics with a εr of 10 and the both dielectrics are covered with metallic gates. Figure 1a shows Ψ(z) of channel electrons at ns = 5×10 12 cm −2 and corresponding potential profile V(z) of the device under the SG configuration. In such a configuration, the channel and top gate (TG) are electrically grounded while the bottom gate (BG) is biased with a positive voltage VBG, as shown in the inset.…”
Section: Methods and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] In addition to the merit of atomic thickness that is favorable for enhancing gate electrostatic control, [8][9][10][11] the self-saturated surfacial atomic structure represents another important advantage superior to silicon for attaining high device performance by suppressing extrinsic charge scattering events. [11][12][13][14] Even though 2D semiconductor FETs have been widely investigated, [15][16][17][18][19] pertinent physical studies regarding the impacts of device parameters and gate configuration on the fundamental envelope function 𝛹 (𝑧), which determines the distribution of electrons in the ultrathin channels of 2D FETs, or on the carrier mobility remained insufficient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noticed that increasing the W U-fin enhances the I on attributed to the increase in effective width (I d α W eff ). 29 Furthermore, increasing the W U-fin leads to a decrease in source/drain resistance, an increase in carrier density, and a decrease in carrier scattering 40 is also one of the reasons contributing to the increase in I on . The I off also increases with W U-fin due to poor gate control over the channel, resulting in SCEs.…”
Section: Jl-dg-invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8c displays the effect of W U-fin on both SS and I on /I off ratio. The SS increases due to inadequate gateelectrostatic control, 40 while I on /I off decreases significantly due to the increase in I off . Figure 9a visualizes the plots of g m and g ds with variations in W U-fin .…”
Section: Jl-dg-invmentioning
confidence: 99%