2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2013.6572158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analog and digital approaches for an energy efficient low complexity channel decoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mitigate mismatch effects in the analog decoding cores, one and two-dimensional common centroid layout techniques were applied throughout the circuits. NMOS transistor dimensions (W/L) were selected as 6.0/0.5 µm following approximate simulations presented in [5]. However, while designing the layout it appeared that uniform dimensions for all transistors result in unused spaces in the layout.…”
Section: Chip Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To mitigate mismatch effects in the analog decoding cores, one and two-dimensional common centroid layout techniques were applied throughout the circuits. NMOS transistor dimensions (W/L) were selected as 6.0/0.5 µm following approximate simulations presented in [5]. However, while designing the layout it appeared that uniform dimensions for all transistors result in unused spaces in the layout.…”
Section: Chip Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since analog decoding circuits even for the most simple codes can easily include several thousands of transistors, the required Monte-Carlo simulation for accurate BER evaluation is not practical. Therefore, simulation of analog decoders has been usually performed through over-simplified methods such as statistical analysis [4], [5]. Such simulations can only offer a rough estimate of the circuit performance and help to modify the critical design factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation