The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.5209/rev_esmp.2013.v19.42162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analizando la elección presidencial del 2012 desde la perspectiva de la "agenda setting" en la prensa de Monterrey

Abstract: ResumenEl presente estudio exploratorio prueba la teoría del agenda setting, se identificó si existe una relación entre la exposición a la agenda de la prensa escrita y la atención los lectores brindan a los temas esta blecidos por dicha agenda. Se utilizaron dos instrumentos (encuestas y análisis de contenido), y se en contró una correspondencia entre dos de los temas más mencionados en las encuestas y dos de los temas predominantes obtenidos mediante el análisis de contenido. Sin embargo la hipótesis del age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence has been found to support the notion that the media set the agenda and agree on important issues. However, it is important to note that some people prefer to get news from sources other than television (Garza-Alanis, 2013). The relevance of issues in electoral campaigns may change in each election, and while political parties may have some influence on the agenda, this influence is less on shared issues (Gilardi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence has been found to support the notion that the media set the agenda and agree on important issues. However, it is important to note that some people prefer to get news from sources other than television (Garza-Alanis, 2013). The relevance of issues in electoral campaigns may change in each election, and while political parties may have some influence on the agenda, this influence is less on shared issues (Gilardi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%