Analisis Tantangan Ketercapaian Indikator Standar Penilaian

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the challenges of achieving indicators of the stages of attitude competency assessment on Assessment Standards. This is important to discuss to ensure the achievement of an institution in eight National Education Standards. This research method uses descriptive participatory research. The participants of this study were ten Educators at Ar Rafi' Drajat Middle School in Bandung. The instrument used refers to thirteen Standard Assessment indicators in the form of interview guidelines. The conclusions of this study are (1) Profile Achievement of the Standard Assessment indicator shows varying results with an average achievement of 78.8%; (2) Indicators that have not reached the maximum score are the use of the results of the knowledge competency assessment, the stages of attitude competency assessment, the type of skills competency assessment and the steps in the assessment of learning processes and outcomes. The recommendations of the results of this study need to be in-depth study of the use of the results of competency assessment of knowledge, attitudes and skills in both the process and learning outcomes by using more authentic instruments.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tantangan ketercapaian indikator tahapan penilaian kompetensi sikap pada Standar Penilaian. Hal ini penting untuk dibahas untuk memastikan ketercapaian suatu lembaga dalam delapan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif pastisipatoris. Partisipan dari penelitian ini adalah sepuluh orang Pendidik di SMP Ar Rafi' Drajat Bandung. Instrumen yang digunakan mengacu pada tiga belas indikator Standar Penilaian berbentuk pedoman wawancara. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah (1) Profil capaian indikator Standar Penilaian menunjukkan hasil yang bervariasi dengan rata-rata capaian sebesar 78,8%; (2) Indikator yang belum mencapai skor maksimum adalah penggunaan hasil penilaian kompetensi pengetahuan, tahapan penilaian kompetensi sikap, jenis penilaian kompetensi keterampilan serta langkah penilaian proses dan hasil belajar. Rekomendasi hasil penelitian ini perlu kajian mendalam tentang penggunaan hasil penilaian kompetensi pengetahuan, sikap dan keterampilan baik pada proses maupun hasil belajar dengan menggunakan instrumen yang lebih otentik.

Distance Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Strengthening of Character, Productivity, and Stem Competency

“…This distance learning success will be demonstrated by a lot and the improvement in the quality of student products. It also shows the effectiveness of online learning supported by STEM literacy (Choy, Yim, & Tan, 2020;Drane, Vernon, & O'Shea, 2020;Pertiwi, Rochman, and Mansyur, 2019). Another consequence is the effectiveness of online learning related to the process of forming and enhancing student character (Asanov et al, 2020;Burhanudin et al, 2020;Tran et al, 2020).…”

“…Data processing is carried out based on several stages. First, giving a score or assessing all aspects of the three components (variables) being measured (Pertiwi et al, 2019). The range of scores used is 3 -6 (qualification: less, moderate, good, and very good).…”

Rekonstruksi Pendidikan Agama Islam bertema ibadah: wudhu’ serta implementasinya pada aspek penilaian sikap

“…Dalam hal ini, siswa menilai dirinya sendiri bahwasanya ia belum banyak melaksanakan indikator tersebut. Metode laporan diri ini berasumsi bahwa orang yang mengetahui keadaan afektif seseorang hanyalah dirinya sendiri seperti yang diungkapkan oleh Pertiwi, Rochman, & Mansyur, (2019). Hal inilah yang melatarbelakangi kejujuran dalam mengungkap karakteristik afektif pada diri sendiri dan menjadi salah satu cara peneliti untuk menilai dan mengobservasi sikap siswa dalam mendapatkan kuesioner ini.…”

Object Analysis of Multiple Choice Writing Test to Know Students' Understanding

“…One of the assessments that need to be developed is knowledge competency. Knowledge assessment is an assessment to measure students' abilities which include factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge as well as low to high level thinking skills (Mattheos et al, 2009;Pertiwi et al, 2019). According to Permendikbud RI No.…”