The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Motivasi Belajar

Abstract: AbstrakLatar belakang penelitian adalah rendahnya kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematis siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematis siswa kelas XI MIA (Matematika dan Ilmu Alam) SMAN 1 Koto Salak Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Metode penelitian adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes, wawancara, dan observasi. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI MIA SMAN 1 Koto Salak sebanyak 27 orang. Hasil pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
13

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
1
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The Indicator applies the indicator emergence model of 41.9%, in this indicator only some of the students interpret solutions to the real world and state the conclusions from the solutions obtained, and there are still students who are wrong in interpreting solutions to the real world and stating conclusions, there are even students who do not solve the problem completely so that they do not get a solution, as a result, they do not interpret the solution to the real world and do not state the conclusion of the solution obtained, based on the results of interviews, students are still wrong in the process of working mathematically so they do not write down interpreting the solutions obtained in the real world and do not state conclusions The results obtained, this is in line with research from [17] which states that in drawing conclusions students write answers without any reason and have not even completed the answers so that they have difficulty in stating conclusions. from the solution obtained…”
Section: Figure 1 Af Student Answer To Test Question Numbersupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The Indicator applies the indicator emergence model of 41.9%, in this indicator only some of the students interpret solutions to the real world and state the conclusions from the solutions obtained, and there are still students who are wrong in interpreting solutions to the real world and stating conclusions, there are even students who do not solve the problem completely so that they do not get a solution, as a result, they do not interpret the solution to the real world and do not state the conclusion of the solution obtained, based on the results of interviews, students are still wrong in the process of working mathematically so they do not write down interpreting the solutions obtained in the real world and do not state conclusions The results obtained, this is in line with research from [17] which states that in drawing conclusions students write answers without any reason and have not even completed the answers so that they have difficulty in stating conclusions. from the solution obtained…”
Section: Figure 1 Af Student Answer To Test Question Numbersupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Karena dengan adanya kemampuan komunikasi yang baik, siswa dapat menyelesaikan permasalahan-permasalahan yang berkaitan dengan komunikasi matematis dengan tepat. Selain itu, akan terlihat seberapa jauh siswa mampu mengeksplorasi gagasan dan pemahamannya dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan matematika yang berkaitan dengan komunikasi matematis (Rismen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Kesimpulan Dan Saranunclassified
“…Berdasarkan kategori kemampuan penalaran matematis, penelitian dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang telah dilakukan oleh peneliti sebelumnya, ditemukan kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik masih rendah (G. A. M. Ahmad et al, 2018), (Rismen et al, 2020), (Isnaeni et al, 2018), (Aprilianti & Zhanty, 2019). Hal tersebut bertolak belakang dengan penelitian (Kurnia Putri et al, 2019), (Yusdiana & Hidayat, 2018) dan (Asdarina & Ridha, 2020) yang mengatakan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik termasuk dalam kategori baik dan tinggi.…”
Section: Studi Berdasarkan Hasil Penelitian Pada Kemampuan Penalaran ...unclassified