2014
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.upsy13-4.appu
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Utrecht Work Engagement Scale en una muestra de trabajadores en Puerto Rico

Abstract: El estudio del engagement en el trabajo es cada vez más común en la literatura científica. La estructura factorial del instrumento más utilizado por los investigadores para evaluar el engagement, la Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), ha mostrado múltiples inconsistencias en diversos países. El objetivo de este trabajo es examinar las propiedades psicométricas de la UWES en una muestra de 2.796 trabajadores en Puerto Rico. Se examinó la estructura factorial de la escala mediante ecuaciones estructurales, con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
3
4
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the theoretical three factor structure for the UWES was empirically supported, as the model fit was excellent. This is in line with all evidence from the developers of the scale (for example, Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003;Balducci et al, 2010) as well as many other validations (Nerstad et al, 2009;Rodríguez-Montalbán et al, 2014;Seppälä et al, 2008;Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman & Aisyah Zahoni, 2016;Shimazu et al, 2008;Spotón et al, 2012;Xanthopoulou et al, 2012;Zecca et al, 2015). On the other hand, several other researchers have found both support for a one-factor solution and the theoretical threefactor structure (Fong & Ng, 2011;Panthee et al, 2014), although it is also true that they finally adopted the three factor structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one hand, the theoretical three factor structure for the UWES was empirically supported, as the model fit was excellent. This is in line with all evidence from the developers of the scale (for example, Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003;Balducci et al, 2010) as well as many other validations (Nerstad et al, 2009;Rodríguez-Montalbán et al, 2014;Seppälä et al, 2008;Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman & Aisyah Zahoni, 2016;Shimazu et al, 2008;Spotón et al, 2012;Xanthopoulou et al, 2012;Zecca et al, 2015). On the other hand, several other researchers have found both support for a one-factor solution and the theoretical threefactor structure (Fong & Ng, 2011;Panthee et al, 2014), although it is also true that they finally adopted the three factor structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Validations with representative samples of occupational groups, such as teachers, at a national level are rare. There has been an abundance of validations in western countries but this scale's properties have been proven in only a few South American countries (Rodríguez-Montalbán et al, 2014;Spotón et al, 2012). The particular objectives are threefold: a) to establish the factor structure of the UWES, b) to estimate the reliability of the scale, and c) to offer evidence on its criterion-related and nomological validity.…”
Section: R E S U M E Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados do Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach apontam que a Uwes e suas dimensões apresentaram consistência interna adequada, em consonância com os resultados de outros estudos 7,[18][19][20] .…”
Section: Tabela 4 Distribuição Das Médias (± Desvio Padrão) Para Aunclassified
“…A experiência com a residência médica tem evidenciado que, embora o treinamento possa causar efeitos prejudiciais na sensibilidade dos médicos em relação aos pacientes, no desempenho acadêmico e profissional, na saúde, no bem-estar e na qualidade de vida pessoal, há contribuições, como o incremento de competências, autoconfiança e segurança profissionais 2,[5][6] . Para Rodríguez-Montalbánet al 7 Destacam-se como consequências positivas da relação do profissional com o ambiente de trabalho: aumento da produtividade, maior disposição, interação com os colegas, motivação e criatividade, redução do absenteísmo e diminuição de erros [8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…De nuevo, estos resultados van en la línea de los resultados obtenidos en estudios previos en muestras europeas y en muestras latinoamericanas, especialmente en Puerto Rico (Rodríguez-Montalbán et al, 2014) y…”
Section: Discussionunclassified