2017
DOI: 10.20886/jphh.2017.35.2.101-114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Biaya Penebangan Sistem Swakelola: Studi Kasus Di Dua Iuphhk-Ha Kalimantan Tengah

Abstract: To improve the efficiency of timber harvesting process, forest industries have implemented tree length ABSTRAKSalah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan efisiensi pemanenan kayu di hutan alam adalah dengan menerapkan metode tree length logging. Namun demikian, peningkatan efisiensi pemanenan kayu tersebut belum diikuti oleh perbaikan kebijakan efisiensi biaya produksi. Sebagai contoh, penerapan kebijakan sistem upah borongan penuh pada kegiatan penebangan pohon dinilai masih relatif mahal sehingga perlu dicari altern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 also shows that the felling costs ranged from 0.208 USD/m 3 to 0.238 USD/m 3 with an average of 0.225 USD/ m 3 . Compared to another study conducted in tropical forests at Central Kalimantan, the felling cost is not significantly different, which ranged from 3.001 USD/m 3 to 0.504 USD/m 3 with an average of 0.374 USD/m 3 [20]. However, compared to another study in North Kalimantan, the felling cost was 0.084 USD/m 3 [28], and the felling costs found in this study were considered expensive.…”
Section: Productivity and Felling Costcontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 also shows that the felling costs ranged from 0.208 USD/m 3 to 0.238 USD/m 3 with an average of 0.225 USD/ m 3 . Compared to another study conducted in tropical forests at Central Kalimantan, the felling cost is not significantly different, which ranged from 3.001 USD/m 3 to 0.504 USD/m 3 with an average of 0.374 USD/m 3 [20]. However, compared to another study in North Kalimantan, the felling cost was 0.084 USD/m 3 [28], and the felling costs found in this study were considered expensive.…”
Section: Productivity and Felling Costcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…The volume of log, productivity, and felling costs were calculated using the following formulas modified [20]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Penerapan kebijakan sistem borongan ini sebenarnya secara keseluruhan merugikan PBPH karena menyisakan limbah tebangan dalam volume besar dan mahalnya upah penebangan. Hasil penelitian (Soenarno, 2017) yang dilakukan di Kalimantan Tengah menunjukkan bahwa biaya penebangan dengan sistim swakelola berkisar antara Rp 4.051,11-Rp 6.800,11/m 3 sedangkan sistim upah borongan berkisar antara Rp 6.000-Rp 7.000/m 3 .…”
Section: B Perhitungan Indeks Tebangunclassified