2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2011.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis bacteriológicos en el tratamiento de las conjuntivitis. Comparación de la resistencia a antibióticos entre 1982 y 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the pathogens of some bacterial endophthalmitis, bacterial corneal ulcers, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular infection diseases turned out to consistent with conjunctival isolated bacteria, and the S. epidermidis has become the predisposing pathogen (Recchia et al, 2005; Carreras, 2012; Sharma et al, 2013). Although, the preoperational topical antibiotics can hardly make the conjunctival sacs sterile, they can effectively reduce the isolating bacteria (Mshangila et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the pathogens of some bacterial endophthalmitis, bacterial corneal ulcers, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular infection diseases turned out to consistent with conjunctival isolated bacteria, and the S. epidermidis has become the predisposing pathogen (Recchia et al, 2005; Carreras, 2012; Sharma et al, 2013). Although, the preoperational topical antibiotics can hardly make the conjunctival sacs sterile, they can effectively reduce the isolating bacteria (Mshangila et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the preoperational topical antibiotics can hardly make the conjunctival sacs sterile, they can effectively reduce the isolating bacteria (Mshangila et al, 2013). The susceptibility of each antibiotic to different bacteria is not identical, and the regional reported drug resistance varies widely due to different environment and the use of antibiotics (Carreras, 2012; Mshangila et al, 2013; Muluye et al, 2014). The overall incidence of isolated bacteria was 24.2%, and we found higher resistance rates to penicillic, macrolides, clindamycin and sulfonamides by CONS, ranging from 57.9 to 90.8%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%