2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552008000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise do tempo de resposta reflexa dos músculos estabilizadores patelares em indivíduos com síndrome da dor patelofemural

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of "Russian electrical stimulation" associated with resistance exercises in patients with patellofemoral dysfunction (PFD), products strength gains and consequently pain relief. Augusto et al 14 verified that the intensity of muscle activation increases with the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which makes it suitable in cases of PFD, since the greater incidence of this dysfunction is related to muscular imbalance, which corroborates the study by Bevilaqua-Grossi et al, 15 where a difference is observed in the reflex activation time between the Vastus Medialis Obliquus (VMO) and Vastus Lateralis Obliquus (VLO) muscles, both in healthy individuals and in patients with PFD. Santos et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The use of "Russian electrical stimulation" associated with resistance exercises in patients with patellofemoral dysfunction (PFD), products strength gains and consequently pain relief. Augusto et al 14 verified that the intensity of muscle activation increases with the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which makes it suitable in cases of PFD, since the greater incidence of this dysfunction is related to muscular imbalance, which corroborates the study by Bevilaqua-Grossi et al, 15 where a difference is observed in the reflex activation time between the Vastus Medialis Obliquus (VMO) and Vastus Lateralis Obliquus (VLO) muscles, both in healthy individuals and in patients with PFD. Santos et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, caution is recommended during clinical physical therapy practice when performing knee extension MVIC during the last degrees of OKC, when there is greater patellofemoral stress 26 . The VLO muscle requires further studies in people with PFPS given that the present study and other studies 16,27,28 , despite methodological differences, found that this portion does not appear to directly interfere in patellar lateralization and in imbalance. According to our results, these changes are attributed, in principle, to the VLL because there were no differences in the activation of this portion in the PFPS subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…1,4,5 However, many authors found no difference between the onset of electric activity of these muscles among individuals with and without PFPS. 1,4,6 Witvrouw et al 4 found that, during activities in open kinetic chain (OKC), the VMO muscle starts its activity later than VL muscle, and, according to those authors, this could lead to patellar misalignment during the activity, a finding consistent with Cowan et al 1 , who also found a difference of the onset of electric activity of patellar stabilizers. However, some studies evidence a simultaneous onset of electric activity between VMO and VL muscles when the leg is extended in OKC exercises, ruling out the hypothesis that the lack of synchronicity could be an etiological factor for PFPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Inclusion and exclusion criteria for groups with and without PFPS signs followed the recommendations by Coqueiro et al 11 and Bevilaqua-Grossi et al 6 The study was conducted according to the Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council, being approved by the Committee of Ethics of the Institution. The common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) was 93dB and the acquisition frequency, 2KHz.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%