DOI: 10.11606/d.14.2019.tde-25052018-101453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise comparativa de aproximações não-hiperbólicas dos tempos de trânsito de dados sísmicos multicomponente utilizando tecnologia OBN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approximation was lately studied concerning its parameter by Li (2003), and after compared with other approximations (Zuniga et al, 2015(Zuniga et al, , 2016b(Zuniga et al, , 2017Zuniga, 2017). As the approximation showed to have a multimodal statistical distribution in previous works, it must be tested with the L1-norm rather than the L2-norm to observe if it could suppress the local minimum region, or at least makes a narrower global minimum region to increase the accuracy during the inversion.…”
Section: Nonhyperbolic Multiparametric Travel-time Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The approximation was lately studied concerning its parameter by Li (2003), and after compared with other approximations (Zuniga et al, 2015(Zuniga et al, , 2016b(Zuniga et al, , 2017Zuniga, 2017). As the approximation showed to have a multimodal statistical distribution in previous works, it must be tested with the L1-norm rather than the L2-norm to observe if it could suppress the local minimum region, or at least makes a narrower global minimum region to increase the accuracy during the inversion.…”
Section: Nonhyperbolic Multiparametric Travel-time Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare nonhyperbolic travel-time approximations was an important analysis to understand which approximation presents the best results and is the most reliable to perform a travel-time curve inversion procedure. This kind of comparison has been performed during the last decade (Aleixo & Schleicher, 2010;Golikov & Stovas, 2012;Zuniga et al, 2015Zuniga et al, , 2016aZuniga et al, ,b, 2017Zuniga, 2017). As the recent works showed an extremely positive results with the use of the approximation proposed by Li & Yuan (2001), the accuracy analysis of this equation is important to be performed concerning the L1-norm, once there is no previous works with this kind of tests.…”
Section: Accuracy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with other authors working with comparison of travel-time approximations (Aleixo & Schleicher, 2010;Golikov & Stovas, 2012), none of them presented a complexity analysis concerning the objective function of the approximations. However, more recent works showed this kind of analysis for PP and PS events (Zuniga, 2017;Zuniga et al, 2015Zuniga et al, , 2016aZuniga et al, ,b, 2017. For this reason, it was possible to observe that there are approximations which presented always a unimodal (there is only the global minimum region) behavior in the topography of the objective function (Malovichko, 1978;Alkhalifah & Tsvankin, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were proposed to understand the nonhyperbolicity from different effects in last decades (Malovichko, 1978;Blias, 1983Blias, , 2009Muir & Dellinger, 1985;Castle, 1988Castle, , 1994Slotboom, 1990;Tsvankin & Thomsen, 1994;Alkhalifah & Tsvankin, 1995;Li & Yuan, 1999Cheret et al, 2000;Causse et al, 2000;Tsvankin & Grechka, 2000a,b;Fomel & Grechka, 2000Li, 2003;Ursin & Stovas, 2006;Aleixo & Schleicher, 2010). Even with a significant number of papers, only few works compare nonhyperbolic approximations in an independent way (Golikov & Stovas, 2012) and for offshore models using multicomponent seismic data (Zuniga et al, 2015(Zuniga et al, , 2016Zuniga, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%