2009
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anal cytology in patients with AIDS

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to study the prevalence of abnormal anal cytology in patients with AIDS. Anal smears, obtained with a cytobrush, of 102 HIV-positive patients of the Emilio Ribas Institute (Sao Paulo, Brazil) were collected, and only after that, the patients were submitted to anoscopy. Thirty-two patients had LSIL and 14 others had HSIL. Squamous intra-epithelial lesions were also observed in 38% of the patients without condyloma (18/47): in 9 of the 33 patients without history of condylo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Cytologic abnormalities would be demonstrated even in patients without macroscopic condyloma in patients with AIDS. 32 In a study of the prevalence of abnormal anal cytology in women with lower genital tract intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer it was observed positive anal cytology in 9% of the patients but there was a high rate of anal HPV by analysis of HPV DNA (51%). 33 The difference of these results with ours would be due to technical procedures for collecting samples, as previously explained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…31 Cytologic abnormalities would be demonstrated even in patients without macroscopic condyloma in patients with AIDS. 32 In a study of the prevalence of abnormal anal cytology in women with lower genital tract intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer it was observed positive anal cytology in 9% of the patients but there was a high rate of anal HPV by analysis of HPV DNA (51%). 33 The difference of these results with ours would be due to technical procedures for collecting samples, as previously explained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cytobrushes improved cervical sampling over cotton swabs by 58-76% for detecting endocervical cells in a sample of >800 adult females >29 years of age (14) and are shown superior to Ayers spatulas (10). One report suggests the cytobrush may be effective in anal cytology,(15) but may be uncomfortable in blind sampling (16). The NF-swab is evaluated extensively for respiratory-pathogen and -cytology sampling, yielding more cells and pathogens than other collection protocols (17-20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for populations in which the prevalence of AIN is lower, little is known about the performance of cytologic screening and its correlation with histology and HPV DNA detection. Published results have varied concerning the sensitivity and specificity of anal cytology,5 and, when available, histologic samples have issued from blinded or forceps biopsy with or without HRA guidance 6, 7. Because AIN often is multifocal, small biopsy specimens, particularly forceps biopsies, may not be sufficient for diagnosis and staging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%