2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthetic potential of propofol for nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Effect of anaesthetic concentration and body weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anesthetic induction occurred quickly, between 1 and 5 minutes, with no hyperactivity and stress reactions being observed. This reinforces the hypothesis that short induction times are desirable because they reduce the possibility of hypoxemia and acute stress responses (Obirikorang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Anesthetic induction occurred quickly, between 1 and 5 minutes, with no hyperactivity and stress reactions being observed. This reinforces the hypothesis that short induction times are desirable because they reduce the possibility of hypoxemia and acute stress responses (Obirikorang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Behavioral changes are of particular value for the welfare assessment of animals [ 60 ]. Propofol is a widely used anesthetic that targets the gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA A ) receptors in the fish brain following rapid absorption through the gills into the arterial blood circulation [ 28 , 61 , 62 ]. It has recently been tested as an anesthetic for Nile tilapia [ 28 ] without reported side effects in this species [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propofol is a widely used anesthetic that targets the gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA A ) receptors in the fish brain following rapid absorption through the gills into the arterial blood circulation [ 28 , 61 , 62 ]. It has recently been tested as an anesthetic for Nile tilapia [ 28 ] without reported side effects in this species [ 24 ]. Yet, in the current study, the fish transport simulated under propofol showed a decreased frequency of swimming and bottom swimming but spent more time swimming than the MS-222 group and were less inactive (frequency and duration of inactivity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations