2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic digestion of swine effluent: Impact of production stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas composition (CH 4 , CO 2 , H 2 ) was determined by gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detector (GC-TCD) (Gopalan et al, 2013). Slurry samples were collected from each reactor twice per week and analysed for total chemical oxygen demand (COD), soluble COD (sCOD) and VFA concentration.…”
Section: Digester Performance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas composition (CH 4 , CO 2 , H 2 ) was determined by gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detector (GC-TCD) (Gopalan et al, 2013). Slurry samples were collected from each reactor twice per week and analysed for total chemical oxygen demand (COD), soluble COD (sCOD) and VFA concentration.…”
Section: Digester Performance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methane production potential of swine manure depends on several factors, including organic matter concentrations, manure retention time inside barns and the growing phase (see Table 1; Gopalan et al, 2013;do Amaral et al, 2016;de Mito et al, 2018). The efficiency of biogas conversion into electric energy is function of the quality of the generator and swine manure characteristics, 1 m 3 of swine manure in a finishing house unit can generate between 13.7 and 22.01 kwh.…”
Section: Nutrient and Energy Potential From Swine Chain Farm Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influence of stratified swine manure on biogas/methane yield Significant differences (p < 0.05) in biogas yield between the swine manure samples from the stratified swine production phases were observed in this study. The differences in VS bioavailability (Table 2) for anaerobic microorganisms among different types of swine manure samples may be caused by different feed strategies and nutrient digestibility, as well as differences in manure management within the facility (Brooks et al, 2014;Gopalan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Kinetic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swine manure characteristics are a function of several factors, such as swine age, diet (feeding and antibiotic) and house design (Brooks et al, 2014). The variability in the methane potential of effluent streams can be associated with changes in production management practices, such as feed, feeding techniques and effluent handling methods (Amaral et al, 2014;Gopalan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%