An urban living lab monitoring and post occupancy evaluation for a Trombe wall proof of concept

Dabaieh, Marwa; Maguid, Dalya; El-Mahdy, Deena; Wanas, Omar

doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.088

Cited by 31 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Efforts to engage participants should focus on local issues in their environment (context), inspiring people to discuss and experiment with innovative solutions through activities such as using models, prototypes, and being involved in design competitions [1]. Users should be involved in every stage of the decision-making process in an interactive way, increasing their acceptance on the proposed solution [76]. Suggestions of engagement activities are presented in Table 2.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…End-users should effectively contribute to decisionmaking and co-creation. (c) Plan the duration of Living Labs: Working with vulnerable groups and achieving effective participation in the decision-making process can increase the duration of Living Lab processes but will likely increase the acceptance of the proposed solutions [76].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Claude et al [37] reported on a French Living Lab to improve old, unoccupied dwellings, but users were not involved in this case. Furthermore, a Living Lab case in Egypt engaged users in assembling and using a Trombe wall system for cooling and heating purposes [75,76].…”

Section: Living Lab's Purposesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). Note: Case A: [27]; Case B: [37]; Case C: [75,76]; Case D: [25,26,57,73]; Case E: [24]; Case F: [44]; Case G: [25,57,58]; Case H: [74]; Case I: [77].…”

Section: Living Lab Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social housing (SH) upgrades involve multiple stakeholders with sometimes divergent requirements and needs. Collaboration and participative processes are essential to ensuring an appropriate value for users is delivered through social housing upgrades. Living Labs are user-centred initiatives where researchers, public and private partners, and users collaborate to develop innovative solutions in real-live environments. However, scarce research exists on how Living Labs may support the upgrading of social housing, and there is a need to explore what the challenges are that can be expected in this context. This paper discusses an integrative literature synthesis of housing upgrades developed within the context of Living Labs. Nine information-rich cases identified in the literature were chosen for in-depth examination. A living lab process was proposed based on the literature and activities and tools used in Living Labs were identified. From the challenges highlighted by existing studies, a series of recommendations to support the development of Living Labs in social housing upgrades was proposed. These should support Living Labs implementation initiatives in this specific context.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Living Lab's Purposesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). Note: Case A: [27]; Case B: [37]; Case C: [75,76]; Case D: [25,26,57,73]; Case E: [24]; Case F: [44]; Case G: [25,57,58]; Case H: [74]; Case I: [77].…”

Section: Living Lab Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Affordable local material is a major concern; in addition to that, direct involvement of local communities has been shown to have positive impacts and performance efficiency. POE has several stages, from simple to detail level, which are owner / occupant oriented, from academia to industry [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Needs of Comfort, Safety, Recognition of a Housing Design with a POE Approach, Case: Dliko Indah Housing Salatiga Indonesia

Indrosaptono¹,

Andadari²,

Setiyawan³

2021

cea

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of housing needs for low-income people continues to increase every year, and the government and the private sector create affordable housing with decent housing according to Indonesian healthy housing standards. Dliko Indah Housing Salatiga is housing that was planned and designed in the form of housing units of various types that were built in the 1980s and still exist today. Dliko housing has been in existence for more than 30 years, and has undergone physical changes in various design elements. This condition is suspected of having several driving factors for residents to change it. Through the post occupancy evaluation (POE) method approach, it is hoped that the answers to the occupants' motivations can be obtained as to why they made these changes and at the same time obtain the driving factors. The aim of this research is that the results can be used as an evaluation in planning and designing similar housing developments in the future. The research method used is a qualitative rationalistic research approach, using stratified random sampling. Related theories and journals are used as a tool to analyze as well as direct research, and to obtain field data. The final result is a variation in the percentage of change rates for each of the elements that make up a simple home design such as: changes in KDB, building plans, functions, facades and changes in materials. These changes are the demands for Comfort, Security, and Recognition.

show abstract