2004
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2004.826564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Update on the IEM Surface Backscattering Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2017, 9, 445 3 of 16 The IEM calculated and the SAR measured backscattering coefficients are mutually compared to evaluate the methodology (Figure 1a). Additionally, comparing the in situ rms-height with the inverse IEM results, the level of efficacy when using the power-law inputs versus the conventional ones can be cleared [12,15] (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Evaluation Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017, 9, 445 3 of 16 The IEM calculated and the SAR measured backscattering coefficients are mutually compared to evaluate the methodology (Figure 1a). Additionally, comparing the in situ rms-height with the inverse IEM results, the level of efficacy when using the power-law inputs versus the conventional ones can be cleared [12,15] (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Evaluation Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K = − jk 4πR exp(−jkR) Corresponding to the Kirchhoff and the complementary surface fields in (6a), (6b), the far-zone scattered field may also be expressed as the sum of the Kirchhoff and complementary scattered fields [3,7]: (16) where the Kirchhoff field is given by…”
Section: Far-zone Scattered Field and Scattering Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the need of predicting bistatic scattering and microwave emissivity, much effort has been devoted to further improving the IEM accuracy [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] by removing some of the assumptions originally imposed for the purpose of mathematical simplicity during the course of derivation. Another leap forward step was the introduction of a transition function into the Fresnel reflection coefficients to take spatial dependence into account, removing the restrictions on the limits of surface roughness and permittivity [3,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backscattering coefficients for different material surfaces can be measured or estimated with existing models such as Kirchhoff method or IEM [2]. Each frequency sample is integrated over a time equal to the reciprocal of a low-pass filter cutoff frequency .…”
Section: A Emission From Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%