2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0059-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unsupervised Approach for Extraction of Blood Vessels from Fundus Images

Abstract: Pathological disorders may happen due to small changes in retinal blood vessels which may later turn into blindness. Hence, the accurate segmentation of blood vessels is becoming a challenging task for pathological analysis. This paper offers an unsupervised recursive method for extraction of blood vessels from ophthalmoscope images. First, a vessel-enhanced image is generated with the help of gamma correction and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE). Next, the vessels are extracted iterati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is pertinent to note here that [44] and [16] achieved such high sensitivity at the cost of specificity and accuracy. Our obtained specificity is slightly lower than the specificity of [46], [47], and [48] which are the best, the second best and third best among unsupervised methods respectively. The average accuracy of the proposed method lies in fourth place close behind [23] who achieved third-best accuracy at the cost of sensitivity.…”
Section: B Comparison With State-of-the-artcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is pertinent to note here that [44] and [16] achieved such high sensitivity at the cost of specificity and accuracy. Our obtained specificity is slightly lower than the specificity of [46], [47], and [48] which are the best, the second best and third best among unsupervised methods respectively. The average accuracy of the proposed method lies in fourth place close behind [23] who achieved third-best accuracy at the cost of sensitivity.…”
Section: B Comparison With State-of-the-artcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The average accuracy of the proposed method lies in fourth place close behind [23] who achieved third-best accuracy at the cost of sensitivity. Talking about MCC, our method outperforms [46] and [23] who achieved best specificity and third-best accuracy respectively. The MCC of our method is in second-place close behind [25].…”
Section: B Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Also, the AUC reported in [33] is less than the AUC obtained by our method. We have also included unsupervised methods [45] [46] [47] in our comparison to comprehensively analyze the performance of our method.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DC is defined as the harmonic mean of PPV and Se. The accuracy is the amount of competence to categorize the quantity of conformism of the segmented image to the manually segmented image [40], [41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parida et al / Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and ImageAnalysis 19(1):[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] 2020 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%