2020
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2020.2999037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unknown Input Nonlinear Observer Based Fractional Order PID Control of Fuel Cell Air Supply System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ou et al relied on PI controller to adjust hydrogen flow, which produced satisfactory control performance [6]. Zhao et al proposed the coefficientoptimized frictional order PID controller (FOPID) for regulating PEMFC air flow, which exhibited superior adaptability Observer feedforward [5] Low cost; Simple structure and easy modification Difficult to cope with nonlinearity; long regulating time and narrow range of control policies PI controller [6] Coefficient-optimized FOPID [7] PSO-PID controller [8] Adaptive control T2-FLS controller [9] Ability to cope with Nonlinear system; anti-interference; excellent robustness Lack of systematic design; low control accuracy; poor dynamic quality MRAC [10] Model predictive control Off-line robust MPC [11] Excellent dynamic performance; excellent stability and strong anti-interference ability Complex controller, Large calculated amount, Over-reliance on accurate mathematical model DMPC [12] Neural network control Neural network feedforward [13] Avoid modelling; learning ability; more accurate model and controller with more data…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ou et al relied on PI controller to adjust hydrogen flow, which produced satisfactory control performance [6]. Zhao et al proposed the coefficientoptimized frictional order PID controller (FOPID) for regulating PEMFC air flow, which exhibited superior adaptability Observer feedforward [5] Low cost; Simple structure and easy modification Difficult to cope with nonlinearity; long regulating time and narrow range of control policies PI controller [6] Coefficient-optimized FOPID [7] PSO-PID controller [8] Adaptive control T2-FLS controller [9] Ability to cope with Nonlinear system; anti-interference; excellent robustness Lack of systematic design; low control accuracy; poor dynamic quality MRAC [10] Model predictive control Off-line robust MPC [11] Excellent dynamic performance; excellent stability and strong anti-interference ability Complex controller, Large calculated amount, Over-reliance on accurate mathematical model DMPC [12] Neural network control Neural network feedforward [13] Avoid modelling; learning ability; more accurate model and controller with more data…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm in deep reinforcement learning (Lillicrap et al, 2015) is a model-free method (Yang et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019a;Yang et al, 2019b;. Due to its strong adaptive ability, the DDPG algorithm can adapt to the uncertainty inherent in nonlinear control systems, and it is applied in various control fields (Zhang et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021). However, due to its low robustness, DDPG is rarely used in the PEMFC control field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PID and its associated algorithms have been widely used in fuel cell control and other practical engineering applications due to their simple control policy and good robustness. A number of PID control methods have been proposed, including neural PID control [30], a fuzzy PID control [31], an algorithm combining PID and fuzzy control [32], a feedback linearization control policy (for transforming a nonlinear control model into a linear model) [33], and a fraction-order PID (FOPID) control based on nonlinear observer with unknown input [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%