2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unfamiliar social presence reduces facial disgust responses to food stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjective ratings of liking, wanting, and valence were positively associated with EMG activity in the zygomatic major muscle while the participants viewed food images. These results corroborate prior findings reporting positive associations between subjective valence/liking ratings and zygomatic major EMG activity in response to food images [6,7]. Our study did not show any evident association between hedonic ratings and corrugator supercilii EMG activity, which is inconsistent with previous studies [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The subjective ratings of liking, wanting, and valence were positively associated with EMG activity in the zygomatic major muscle while the participants viewed food images. These results corroborate prior findings reporting positive associations between subjective valence/liking ratings and zygomatic major EMG activity in response to food images [6,7]. Our study did not show any evident association between hedonic ratings and corrugator supercilii EMG activity, which is inconsistent with previous studies [6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These results corroborate prior findings reporting positive associations between subjective valence/liking ratings and zygomatic major EMG activity in response to food images [6,7]. Our study did not show any evident association between hedonic ratings and corrugator supercilii EMG activity, which is inconsistent with previous studies [6][7][8]. These discrepant findings may be due to methodological differences across studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations