No abstract

No abstract

Highlights Reverse osmosis results in significant losses in volatile compounds and modified sensory profiles. Volatile losses appear to be related to compound structure, not compound size. Reverse osmosis efficiency varies between beer styles, with longer processing times for stouts. Reverse osmosis membranes are susceptible to fouling over time, affecting overall product quality.

Consumer sensory evaluation, aroma release analysis and biophysical protein analysis were used to investigate the effect of ethanol on the release and perception of flavour in beer (lager and stout) at different ethanol levels (0 and 5% ABV). Consumer study results showed no significant differences in orthonasal perception, yet retronasal results showed that 0% lager was perceived as maltier with reduced fruitiness, sweetness, fullness/body and alcohol warming sensation (p < 0.05). Whilst ethanol alone decreases the aroma release regardless of LogP, the presence of α-amylase selectively reduces the headspace concentration of hydrophobic compounds. It was found that ethanol has a subtle inhibitory effect on the binding of hydrophobic compounds to α-amylase, thereby increasing their headspace concentration in the 5% ABV as compared to the 0% beers. This synergistic ethanol * saliva effect is attributed to the changes in the conformation of α-amylase due to ethanol-induced denaturation. It is hypothesised that the partially unfolded protein structures have a lower number of hydrophobic pockets, leading to a lower capacity to entrap hydrophobic aroma compounds. This supports the hypothesis that ethanol * saliva interactions directly impact the sensory and flavour properties of beer, which would provide a basis for further investigations in reformulation of 0% ABV drinks.

This study investigated the individual variability in oral tactile sensitivity considering touch, by means of Von Frey Hair monofilaments (VFH) and spatial resolution, using the grating orientation test (GOT). The relationships of the two measures with 6‐n‐propylthiouracil (PROP) responsiveness and fungiform papillae density and size were investigated. One hundred and forty‐four subjects (48.6% women, aged 18–30) participated in the study. VFH and GOT thresholds were assessed by three‐down/one‐up staircase method. Responsiveness to 3.2 mM PROP was assessed on the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Fungiform papillae density (FPD) and size were determined from automated counting. VFH thresholds appeared unsuitable to reveal individual variation in responsiveness to point‐pressure on the tongue. The frequency of GOT thresholds approximated a normal distribution and covered the whole range of variation, thus indicating an ability to measure individual variation in oral tactile sensitivity. No significant linear correlations were found between any of the oral tactile sensitivity measures and PROP responsiveness, FPD total and size class. VFH and GOT thresholds were not significantly associated. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was used to classify participants for their PROP responsiveness, total FPD and GOT threshold. Three clusters were identified, C1 (n = 67), Cl2 (n = 42), and Cl3 (n = 35), differing for PROP responsiveness and FPD only. Results encourage future studies to explore association between GOT and both perception and preference for different food texture. Furthermore, deeper investigation of individual variability in sensitivity to different types of oral tactile stimuli would be helpful to capture differences in tactile sensitivity among the most sensitive individuals.