2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unbiased iterative group registration template for cortical surface analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
319
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
319
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this problem, investigators have implemented neuroimaging approaches that rely upon improved registration techniques (volumetric or surface-based), presuming that alignment of anatomical features will improve the alignment of functional areas. The most advanced registration methods available attempt to compensate for individual variation in brain surface shape, size, and folding pattern (Lyttelton et al, 2007;Van Essen, 2005;Van Essen and Dierker, 2007). However, this approach does not provide an ideal solution because the location and extent of each functional area varies substantially from person to person, irrespective of anatomical landmarks (Amunts et al, 2000;Amunts et al, 1999;Andrews et al, 1997;Uylings et al, 2005;Van Essen et al, 1984).…”
Section: Overcoming Individual Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, investigators have implemented neuroimaging approaches that rely upon improved registration techniques (volumetric or surface-based), presuming that alignment of anatomical features will improve the alignment of functional areas. The most advanced registration methods available attempt to compensate for individual variation in brain surface shape, size, and folding pattern (Lyttelton et al, 2007;Van Essen, 2005;Van Essen and Dierker, 2007). However, this approach does not provide an ideal solution because the location and extent of each functional area varies substantially from person to person, irrespective of anatomical landmarks (Amunts et al, 2000;Amunts et al, 1999;Andrews et al, 1997;Uylings et al, 2005;Van Essen et al, 1984).…”
Section: Overcoming Individual Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Then we employed an iterative surface registration algorithm with an unbiased iterative group template showing enhanced anatomic detail to ensure between-individual correspondence at each vertex of the cortical surface model. 22 For regional analysis, automatic lobar parcellation, which had been validated and performed efficiently in previous studies, was applied for dividing individual cortical surfaces into frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. 23,24 The surface-based parcellation was performed using CIVET pipeline (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/CIV-ET).…”
Section: Brain Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure resulted in 40,962 vertices for each hemisphere. The cortical surfaces were non-linearly aligned to a standardized surface template (Lyttelton, Boucher, Robbins, & Evans, 2007). Cortical thickness data were smoothed following surface curvature using a blurring kernel of 20 mm.…”
Section: Cortical Thickness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%