1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00064-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ultrastructural analysis of tissue surrounding a microdialysis probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
141
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
141
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The insertion SD supports prior conclusions that probe insertion causes a penetration injury. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Two additional examples of complete recordings of K + and glucose from single animals are provided in the Supplementary Information document. Figure S1 is an example with needle pricks that produced neither a K + spike nor a glucose dip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The insertion SD supports prior conclusions that probe insertion causes a penetration injury. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Two additional examples of complete recordings of K + and glucose from single animals are provided in the Supplementary Information document. Figure S1 is an example with needle pricks that produced neither a K + spike nor a glucose dip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies from the rat striatum have established that probe insertion triggers ischemia in the vicinity of the probe and that a glial barrier eventually surrounds and engulfs the probe, thereby hindering long-term sampling. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Adding DEX to the perfusion fluid reduces ischemia and suppresses gliosis. Consistent with these prior reports, the present study confirms that DEX retrodialysis enhances the performance of microdialysis monitoring also in the rat cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the small size of the probe, minimal tissue damage occurs during insertion into the brain, and tracts are undetectable under a light microscope (25 ). This is in contrast to larger probes (Ͼ200 m in diameter), such as are used in microdialysis, which cause tissue disruption up to 1.4 mm from the probe site (29 ). Fig.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this may be an underestimate because uptake competes with diffusion of dopamine to the probe, effectively lowering the sampled concentration (15). Also, because microdialysis probes are relatively large, calculations of basal levels must take into account the damaged tissue layer that forms around the probe (16).…”
Section: Dopaminergic Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%