2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr06667h
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ultrahigh thermal conductive graphene flexible paper

Abstract: Graphene nanosheets (GNSs) possess outstanding conductivity, good thermal and chemical stabilities and desirable mechanical strengths. However, the unfunctionalized GNSs are hydrophobic and insoluble in water, which limits their application in many technological areas. Herein, we report a design strategy to exfoliate few-layered aqueous dispersible graphene by a simple ball-milling technique. The modifier of sodium lignosulfonate (LS) enables to synthesize LS-decorated GNSs from natural graphite based on the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lateral size, morphology, shape, and thickness of the 2D nanosheets are usually determined via microscopic characterization by high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR‐TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (see examples in Figure ). While the former allows the estimation of the number of layers of exfoliated ( N L ) sheets by counting the number of sheet's edges and by using electron diffraction patterns, the latter enables the estimation of N L by measuring the height of the flakes and dividing it by the corresponding interlayer distance . Yet, it is important to note that the estimation of SL flakes height via AFM varies with the nature of the substrate (e.g., roughness, hydrophobicity, or hydrophilicity) and depends on the magnitude of the force applied by the tip to the sample as well as the experimental conditions such as relative humidity .…”
Section: Production Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lateral size, morphology, shape, and thickness of the 2D nanosheets are usually determined via microscopic characterization by high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR‐TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (see examples in Figure ). While the former allows the estimation of the number of layers of exfoliated ( N L ) sheets by counting the number of sheet's edges and by using electron diffraction patterns, the latter enables the estimation of N L by measuring the height of the flakes and dividing it by the corresponding interlayer distance . Yet, it is important to note that the estimation of SL flakes height via AFM varies with the nature of the substrate (e.g., roughness, hydrophobicity, or hydrophilicity) and depends on the magnitude of the force applied by the tip to the sample as well as the experimental conditions such as relative humidity .…”
Section: Production Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society; c) AFM images represent SL and FL graphene. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry; d) AFM images of EE h‐BN nanosheets.…”
Section: Production Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thickness of the film could be adjusted in the range 3~50 μm along with the different volume and concentration of graphene dispersion, and the conductivities of these films were further measured. These films were found to exhibit mean conductivity of 2.1 ± 0.1 × 10 4 S m −1 before annealing and can be further improved to 4.8 × 10 4 S m −1 after annealing at 500 °C for 2 h, which is much higher than the most of graphene films prepared by similar solution exfoliation 13 18 , 26 29 , 35 , 36 . Because the films were produced through a slow process, the annealing would be more ordered and decrease the content of oxygen-containing groups on graphene surface, which would result in the electrical conductivity enhancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…3a–c ). The SAED pattern images reveal the isolated single-layer GNPs with the typical hexagonal symmetry 29 31 . GNPs were further analyzed through high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) and these images were listed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%