2009
DOI: 10.1080/17525090902992339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of social work education in the United States: new directions and new opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have found that critical consciousness or critical thinking was eliminated by Chinese social workers in their practice (Lei and Huang, 2018). In contrast, this study suggests that critical consciousness can be a central predictor of success under the competence framework as identified by Colby (2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have found that critical consciousness or critical thinking was eliminated by Chinese social workers in their practice (Lei and Huang, 2018). In contrast, this study suggests that critical consciousness can be a central predictor of success under the competence framework as identified by Colby (2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW) and the International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) have put emphasis on fostering practitioners with the ability of critical self-reflexivity irrespective of contexts (Sewpaul and Jones, 2004). Critical consciousness is included throughout the social work competence framework in the United Kingdom and the United States (Colby, 2009; O’Hagan, 2007). By making people feel attached to and capable of their work, critical consciousness was found to help prevent or ameliorate burnout (Diemer et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koлби (Colby, 2009) истиче да традиционални приступ, у образовању и пракси социјалног рада, за пружање информација у пасивној форми није више довољан за постизање компетенција повезаних с критичким размишљањем. Односно, идеја да професор (или практичар) пасивно преноси информације студентима (или корисницима), без укључивања истих у различите дискусије и дијалоге не доноси позитивне исходе.…”
Section: критичко размишљање као интегрални део образовања (и праксе)unclassified