An Overview of Environmental and Resource Economics

Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den

doi:10.4337/9781843768586.00010

Cited by 16 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As policy analysts become more cognizant of spatial factors, with increasing abilities to assess spatial patterns through computer-aided decision support tools, economists can anticipate increasing demand for explicit consideration of spatial attributes (Bockstael 1996;Nijkamp 1999;van den Bergh 1999). In this regard, the presented results are promising for analysts using stated preference methods to inform rural land use policy, as they suggest that stated preference surveys and associated preference models can estimate preferences for fairly fine spatial elements of rural development and preservation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use

Johnston¹,

Swallow²,

Bauer³

2002

Land Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines whether and how survey respondents react to spatial factors in stated preference surveys, and the ways in which preferences for spatial factors may influence welfare estimation. Alternative proposals to develop rural lands for residential purposes in southern New England were studied. Results illustrate that spatial attributes can influence estimated willingness to pay for development plans, even in cases where spatial attributes are only presented as cartographic details of maps used to clarify survey scenarios. Moreover, we find that subtle, and potentially unintended, spatial features presented in choice questions may influence marginal valuation of non-spatial attributes. (R52)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use

Johnston¹,

Swallow²,

Bauer³

2002

Land Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several management options exist for sharing the benefits and risks in the Bothnian case. Voluntary databases for by‐products, long‐term recycling contracts, by‐product retailing (wholesale), waste stock market arrangements, site‐based waste retailing, tradable pollution permits, and natural resource banking are all well‐known means of environmental and natural resource management (see, e.g., Van den Bergh 1999; Tietenberg et al 1999). One option would be the “Gulf of Bothnia Waste Insurance Company.” The company would act as a risk taker and it would be funded by member corporations.…”

Section: Toward Common‐pool Resource Governance Of the Gulf Of Bothnimentioning

confidence: 99%

Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation

Salmi¹,

Hukkinen

Heino

et al. 2011

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Many scholars of industrial ecology have focused on the institutional and organizational challenges of building and maintaining regional industrial symbiosis through the synergistic integration of material and energy flows. Despite the promise that these intellectual developments hold for the future dematerialization of industrial production, they rarely address the actual regulatory obstacles of turning wastes into raw materials. In this article we introduce a potential future industrial symbiosis around the Gulf of Bothnia between Finland and Sweden, and assess the regulatory bottlenecks related to waste by‐product consideration. We find that although the Gulf of Bothnia region has technological and economic potential for industrial symbiosis, the regulatory support for this is insufficient. We suggest a common pool resource‐based governance system that could utilize market and regulatory mechanisms in a regional‐level cross‐border system of governance. Importantly, the suggested governance system would protect the users of potential raw materials from unpredictable waste regulation, market risks related to large‐scale material flows, and societal risks of hazardous waste treatment.

show abstract

“…Через взаємовплив економічних та соціальних відмінностей, цифровий розрив неможливо подолати без змін економічних умов господарювання країн і са мореалізації громадян. Хоча економісти, соціологи та політики [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] схильні використовувати дохід як ос новний критерій нерівності і, отже, добробуту, вони мо жуть нехтувати розглядом соціальних трансформацій як детермінуючої складової глобальних трансформацій.…”

Section: виклад основного матеріалу дослідженняunclassified

Теоретико-Методологічні Підходи До Дослідження Проявів Цифрової Нерівності Під Впливом Соціо-Економічних Трансформацій

Олійник

2023

Журнал "Інвестиції: практика та досвід"

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An Overview of Environmental and Resource Economics

Cited by 16 publications

References 7 publications

Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use

Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use

Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation

Теоретико-Методологічні Підходи До Дослідження Проявів Цифрової Нерівності Під Впливом Соціо-Економічних Трансформацій

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About