1998
DOI: 10.1002/ncr.87406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Citizen Participation in Health Planning: Lessons Learned from the Literature

Abstract: Much can be learned from the experience of citizen participation in health planning over the past thirty years. A review of literature on the subject reveals seven key themes: systems change, knowledge transfer, civic engagement, inclusion, decision making, project organization, and project leadership.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with some research findings conducted by many researchers that education can increase people's participation (see for instance, Perlstadt, et al, 1998). Farmers with higher education level were prepared to pay irrigation service fees in full because they could make better vision over the continuity of pump irrigation in relation to their income prospect.…”
Section: Analysis Of Binary Logistic Regressionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is consistent with some research findings conducted by many researchers that education can increase people's participation (see for instance, Perlstadt, et al, 1998). Farmers with higher education level were prepared to pay irrigation service fees in full because they could make better vision over the continuity of pump irrigation in relation to their income prospect.…”
Section: Analysis Of Binary Logistic Regressionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At the core of these conceptual debates is the nature of the citizen‐expert relationship – what it is and what it should be 5 . Much of the empirical research on public participation has documented a history of expert‐driven public participation processes where ‘citizens’, ‘users’ or ‘lay persons’ are consulted to determine their views about a narrow range of issues defined by someone else 1,6–20 . Citizens are challenging these roles and the limited opportunities that have existed to make meaningful contributions to planning and policy processes 21–23 and new approaches to public participation design have been formulated that emphasize greater interaction between the public and experts 23–28 …”
Section: Introduction and Study Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public and patient involvement in health planning processes has long been recognized as a means for opening up decision‐making processes, safeguarding public interest, and incorporating user perspectives or ‘patient voice’ into professional and planning discussions 1,4,6–11 . Despite a long history of attempts to involve the public and patients in health planning processes, such attempts often fail to move from rhetoric to reality 10–17 . A new wave of policies has been introduced in the UK's National Health Service to encourage public and patient involvement both in decision making about their individual care and in service development at the system level 5,6,14–17 .…”
Section: Introduction and Study Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation