An orthopantomography study of prevalence of impacted teeth

Aitasalo, Kalle; Lehtinen, Risto; Oksala, E

doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(72)80001-2

Cited by 85 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…KRAMER & WILLIAMS [3] revealed that 18.2% of 3,745 patients had one or more impactions and among them 62.6% were maxillary third molars. A similar report was presented by AITASALO [4].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

A case of an ectopic tooth in the maxillary sinus.

Kawana

Yamamoto

Akiba

et al. 1985

The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…KRAMER & WILLIAMS [3] revealed that 18.2% of 3,745 patients had one or more impactions and among them 62.6% were maxillary third molars. A similar report was presented by AITASALO [4].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

A case of an ectopic tooth in the maxillary sinus.

Kawana

Yamamoto

Akiba

et al. 1985

The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…1 Eruption disturbances of mandibular second permanent molars are rather rare. The incidence of second molar impaction revealed by panoramic radiograph studies has been reported as 0.03% 2 to 0.04% 3 of all impacted teeth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Uprighting Partially Impacted Permanent Second Molars

Sawicka

Racka-Pilszak

Rosnowska-Mazurkiewicz

2007

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impaction of the lower second molar is not a common problem, but it is very challenging for both orthodontist and oral surgeon. Treatment options depend on the degree of tooth inclination, the position of the third molars, and the desired type of movement, which may be surgical and/or orthodontic in nature. A good treatment alternative is surgical uncovering with orthodontically-assisted eruption. A case of successful uprighting using a 0.017 ϫ 0.025-inch titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) tip-back cantilever is presented. Different aspects of uprighting impacted second molars are discussed in light of the literature. The iatrogenic character of lower second molar impaction is emphasized.

show abstract

“…Of these, the presence of inverted central incisors is much less frequent compared to the other series [10]. In addition to this rate, only a few case reports indicated the solution for the circumstance based on similar situation in other sites [7,8,11,12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthodontic and Surgical Treatment in an Inverted Maxillary Impacted Central Incisor: A Case Report

Nguyen¹,

Ngoc²

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A 13-year-old boy was referred to the oral surgery department with the chief complaint of non-eruption of the permanent maxillary left incisor. The anterior traumatic history of the patient was unremarkable. A clinical examination revealed the presence of an inverted impacted incisor in the vestibular. A radiographic examination, CT Scanner evaluated accurately the position, morphology and adjacent structures. The findings showed the necessity for an interdisciplinary approach between the orthodontist and oral surgeons to address the patient's issue.

show abstract

An orthopantomography study of prevalence of impacted teeth

Cited by 85 publications

References 5 publications

A case of an ectopic tooth in the maxillary sinus.

A case of an ectopic tooth in the maxillary sinus.

Uprighting Partially Impacted Permanent Second Molars

Orthodontic and Surgical Treatment in an Inverted Maxillary Impacted Central Incisor: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About