2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three different methods have been described for the integral fusion model 79,83,85,110 , of which one model was included in the search: a mean 3D head based on conventional cephalograms adjusted with 3D facial and dental data 79,83 ; a 3D head based on MSCT and MRI data 85 ; and the 3D virtual head based on the augmented model 110 (unpublished).…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of 3d Image Fusion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three different methods have been described for the integral fusion model 79,83,85,110 , of which one model was included in the search: a mean 3D head based on conventional cephalograms adjusted with 3D facial and dental data 79,83 ; a 3D head based on MSCT and MRI data 85 ; and the 3D virtual head based on the augmented model 110 (unpublished).…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of 3d Image Fusion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOGUCHI et al 83 described a comparable image fusion technique using a conventional lateral and anteroposterior cephalogram (representing the axes of a Cartesian coordinate system) as a base to integrate a 3D laser scanned facial surface and a 3D laser scanned dental cast. In order to use the model for simulation of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, a generic MSCT model of a mandible is used, which is mathematically transformed (reshaped) before integrating it with the cephalograms and the dental casts.…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of 3d Image Fusion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate assessment of the cleft size and calculation of the bone volume required for bone grafting based on conventional X-ray and computed tomography (CT) imaging is difficult due to individual differences and the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure. With advancements in image processing technology, surgical simulations have been performed based on CT scan data in maxillofacial surgery 14,18 . With the spread of implant treatment, 3D diagnostic imaging of the jaw bone and preoperative simulation have been widely used in dental implant surgery 11,12,21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year 2000, Csaszar and Niederdellmann utilized three-dimensional (3D) orthognathic surgery simulation in reproducing planned patient treatment 1 . Other procedures included virtual surgery on a computer-generated 3D head model simulated by a computerassisted 3D virtual osteotomy system for orthognathic surgery 2 , a complete 3D system of model surgery and navigation (computerized operation simulation and model operation system) 3 , computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery 2001 software for hard tissue prediction of orthognathic surgical procedures 4 , computer-assisted 3D virtual reality soft tissue planning and prediction for orthognathic surgery 5 , 3D cephalometry 6 and 3D imaging for virtual assessment and treatment planning 7 . Presently, there are no accurate techniques to determine the actual change in maxillary movement intraoperatively when compared with planned movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%