2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An orocline in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the regional area, the marine stratum gradually disappeared at the end of the Early Carboniferous, and the continental stratum developed in the Late Carboniferous (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 1996), suggesting that the ocean basin was gradually closed during this period. Due to the limitation of field conditions, the emplacement age of the ophiolites have not been tested directly (Dong et al, 2018; Feng et al, 2018, 2019; Gou, Sun, Deng, Feng, & Tang, 2020; Y. J. Liu et al, 2019, 2021). Combined with the age of Xinlin leucogranite in the north of the suture zone (324 ± 1 Ma; Feng et al, 2019), structural and stratigraphic contact relationship, it is inferred that the tectonic emplacement age of ophiolites in the study area may be concentrated in the late Early Carboniferous, but it should be no later than the Late Carboniferous, that is, the period of collision and orogeny and the approximate closing time of the back‐arc basin (Figure 9III).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the regional area, the marine stratum gradually disappeared at the end of the Early Carboniferous, and the continental stratum developed in the Late Carboniferous (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 1996), suggesting that the ocean basin was gradually closed during this period. Due to the limitation of field conditions, the emplacement age of the ophiolites have not been tested directly (Dong et al, 2018; Feng et al, 2018, 2019; Gou, Sun, Deng, Feng, & Tang, 2020; Y. J. Liu et al, 2019, 2021). Combined with the age of Xinlin leucogranite in the north of the suture zone (324 ± 1 Ma; Feng et al, 2019), structural and stratigraphic contact relationship, it is inferred that the tectonic emplacement age of ophiolites in the study area may be concentrated in the late Early Carboniferous, but it should be no later than the Late Carboniferous, that is, the period of collision and orogeny and the approximate closing time of the back‐arc basin (Figure 9III).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the regional area, the marine stratum gradually disappeared at the end of the Early Carboniferous, and the continental stratum developed in the Late Carboniferous (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 1996), suggesting that the ocean basin was gradually closed during this period. Due to the limitation of field conditions, the emplacement age of the ophiolites have not been tested directly (Dong et al, 2018;Feng et al, 2018Feng et al, , 2019Gou, Sun, Deng, Feng, & Tang, 2020;Y. J. Liu et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Tectonic Evolution Of the Wunuer Ophiolitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the history of CAOB involved accretion and amalgamation of oceanic plateaus, seamounts, island arcs, and microcontinents (e.g., Kröner et al, 2014; Safonova & Santosh, 2014; Windley et al, 2007; Xiao et al, 2010; G. X. Yang et al, 2015; G. X. Yang, Li, et al, 2019), and accompanied with ridge subduction, slab roll‐back and oroclinal bending processes (e.g., P. F. Li et al, 2018, 2022; Y. J. Liu et al, 2021; T. Wang, Tong, et al, 2022; Windley & Xiao, 2018; Xiao et al, 2018, Xiao et al, 2020). However, geological effects of the subduction of seamounts and oceanic plateaus, which are likely present seamount chains on the ocean floors (e.g., Buchs et al, 2016; Greene et al, 2009; Kerr et al, 2000; Timm et al, 2013; J. Zhang & Zhang, 2020), has not been comprehensively evaluated yet during the formation of the CAOB (G. X. Yang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Implications For the Evolution Of Caobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X. Yang et al, 2015;G. X. Yang, Li, et al, 2019) Liu et al, 2021;T. Wang, Tong, et al, 2022;Xiao et al, 2018.…”
Section: Implications For the Evolution Of Caobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is a giant accretion‐type orogen stretching from east to west, situated between the Siberian Craton and the Tarim‐North China Craton, which is one of the most significant continental accretion and modification areas around the world (Chen, Liang, et al, 2021; Li, 2006; Liu et al, 2021; Şengör & Natal'in, 1996; Şengör, Natal'in, & Burtman, 1993, Sengor, Natal'in, Sunal, & van der Voo, 2018; Xiao et al, 2009). Northeast China (NE China) is an essential part of the eastern segment of the CAOB, also known as the Xing'an‐Mongolian Orogenic Belt (XMOB; Heilongjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 1993; Ren, Jiang, Zhang, & Qing, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%