2016
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2015.2477244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimized Swinging Door Algorithm for Identifying Wind Ramping Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sample WPRs, a data mining method [31] was used to detect the ramping events in historical wind power data. A nonlinear least square (NLS) analysis was adopted to estimate all the parameters (ω, µ, and σ) of the mixture components of a Gaussian model [17].…”
Section: Modeling Of Wind Power and Wprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sample WPRs, a data mining method [31] was used to detect the ramping events in historical wind power data. A nonlinear least square (NLS) analysis was adopted to estimate all the parameters (ω, µ, and σ) of the mixture components of a Gaussian model [17].…”
Section: Modeling Of Wind Power and Wprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult for the power system to retain secure, reliable and economic operations, especially at a high level of wind power penetrations. According to the actual situation of wind power integration, power system operators (PSOs) find that the large-scale wind power can increase or decrease in a very short time period with large and rapid fluctuations [3,4]. With the recent rapid development of the energy storage system (ESS), it is becoming a hot focus to use the ESS to mitigate the uncertainty and variability of wind power for government policies, power and energy industries and academic research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the direct method, the wind power ramp rate, or a parameter related to wind power ramps, is forecast directly. Support Vector Machines (SVM) were found to be the most accurate method by Zheng and Kusiakm after comparison of five different algorithms [15]. A combinatorial forecast method known as atom sparse decomposition (ASD) and a back propagation neural network (BPNN) was proposed by Cui et al [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support Vector Machines (SVM) were found to be the most accurate method by Zheng and Kusiakm after comparison of five different algorithms [15]. A combinatorial forecast method known as atom sparse decomposition (ASD) and a back propagation neural network (BPNN) was proposed by Cui et al [15,16]. This method avoids the effect of instability of the original signal on the predicted result and greatly improves the precision by decomposing the original signal before its prediction and replacing the residual signal for the original signal as an input to the BPNN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%