2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2017.8202268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online multi-robot SLAM system for 3D LiDARs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are indicative as the ICP setting of [7] slightly differs from the setting of [9] we use; odo.+ICP : combines odometry N R (T odo , Q odo ) and ICP N R (T icp ,Q icp ) measurements with our proposed covariance estimates considering them as independent measurements, as in Figure 2 (left) and e.g. [2]; proposed : involves odometry N R (T odo , Q odo ) and ICP N R (T icp ,Q icp ) estimates along with the crosscorrelation termQ cross , see Figure 2 (right). Based on Section II, we prune ICP registration from the posegraph using a Neyman-Pearson statistical test about difference between the ICP and odometry log(T −1 icpT odo ).…”
Section: A Compared Methods and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are indicative as the ICP setting of [7] slightly differs from the setting of [9] we use; odo.+ICP : combines odometry N R (T odo , Q odo ) and ICP N R (T icp ,Q icp ) measurements with our proposed covariance estimates considering them as independent measurements, as in Figure 2 (left) and e.g. [2]; proposed : involves odometry N R (T odo , Q odo ) and ICP N R (T icp ,Q icp ) estimates along with the crosscorrelation termQ cross , see Figure 2 (right). Based on Section II, we prune ICP registration from the posegraph using a Neyman-Pearson statistical test about difference between the ICP and odometry log(T −1 icpT odo ).…”
Section: A Compared Methods and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. ICP computes rigid transformationT icp that may serve as a laser odometry sensor which is combined with other types of odometry based on inertial sensors and/or differential wheel speeds, that provide relative transformationT odo [2,3]. To perform fusion for localization one may use, e.g., pose-graph optimization like GTSAM [23] or g 2 o [24], that requires evaluating odometry uncertainty Q odo and ICP uncertainty Q icp .…”
Section: Contributions and Paper's Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WINS achieves decimeter-level positioning accuracy. It is not designed to defeat the accuracies of CV/laser based approaches [6], [19], [20], which can achieve centimeter-level when environments are suitable, e.g., well-lighted, texture-rich, clear in line of sight (LOS). But our design complements them to support navigation in a lightweight and low-cost manner and we are highly resilient to LOS limitations so as to work in vision/lasercrippled scenarios.…”
Section: F Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might argue that in large buildings for example airport, not all users share the common place. It is possible to first build several sub-maps, and then merge them into a large and consistent map [51] [52] [53]. An edge is added to connect the first nodes in different tracks.…”
Section: F Merging Tracks At Different Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%