1988
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(88)90067-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An on-line ferromagnetic wear debris sensor for machinery condition monitoring and failure detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Magnetic inductive debris sensors have met some success but are limited to debris larger than about 100 m in size. [8][9][10] The acoustic emission detection method based on the amplitude change in reflected acoustic waves is sensitive to interference caused by background acoustic emission and lubrication oil temperature variation. [11][12][13] Bulk capacitance sensing 14,15 uses a simple sensing structure; however the measured capacitance often reflects not only the presence of particles but also changes in total acid number and oil viscosity in the working fluid; this, in turn, creates difficulties in detecting debris.…”
Section: A Microfluidic Coulter Counting Device For Metal Wear Detectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Magnetic inductive debris sensors have met some success but are limited to debris larger than about 100 m in size. [8][9][10] The acoustic emission detection method based on the amplitude change in reflected acoustic waves is sensitive to interference caused by background acoustic emission and lubrication oil temperature variation. [11][12][13] Bulk capacitance sensing 14,15 uses a simple sensing structure; however the measured capacitance often reflects not only the presence of particles but also changes in total acid number and oil viscosity in the working fluid; this, in turn, creates difficulties in detecting debris.…”
Section: A Microfluidic Coulter Counting Device For Metal Wear Detectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1980, the on-line detection of oil debris emerge [3], which used a magnet to capture and isolate the metallic debris from the flow path. K. W. Chambers designed an on-line wear debris sensor based on induction in 1988, in which the influence of the inductive current, oil temperature, oil viscosity, linear speed and wear debris size were studied and tested [4]. The result was the output of wear debris sensor is direct proportion to the electromagnetic material characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear condition of friction pairs in machine can be known by detecting the wear debris concentration [1,2,3]. The inductive detection for metal wear debris in oil is a noncontacting and quick method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%