Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fpm.2011.6045873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The key points of inductive wear debris sensor

Abstract: This review paper has presented several examples of inductive wear debris sensor. Many of these have important applications in industry. Thus, when monitoring the oil system which operates under extremely severe conditions and various features (size and type) need to detect, it is worth considering the use of inductive wear debris sensor. Based on the electromagnetic field analysis for the coil and particles, three structures of such sensors, classified by the number of coils, are available, and they all can d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main contaminant is water pollution, the main water contaminants measurements are the capacitance measurement [78][79], impedance measurement [80][81], and the transfer of the material is mainly reflected in the wear of materials. For wear measurements, in recent years the development of photoelectric sensors [82], photoelectric and magnetic sensors [83], mixed image and magnetic sensors [84](as shown in Fig 5.), induction sensor [85], sensors based on capacitance and impedance [86], sensors based on the energy principle [87], sensors based on ultrasonic principle [88]. [84] In view of the development of the on-line condition monitoring sensor technology for lubricating oil, in addition to sensors of the physical and chemical properties of the lubricating oil and the sensors of wear debris, the sensors is also including such as Infrared (IR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry [89]、 XRF (X-ray fluorescence ) sensors [90] 、 Photo-acoustic spectroscopy (PAS) [91] 、 Fluorescence spectroscopy [92] etc..…”
Section: Oil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contaminant is water pollution, the main water contaminants measurements are the capacitance measurement [78][79], impedance measurement [80][81], and the transfer of the material is mainly reflected in the wear of materials. For wear measurements, in recent years the development of photoelectric sensors [82], photoelectric and magnetic sensors [83], mixed image and magnetic sensors [84](as shown in Fig 5.), induction sensor [85], sensors based on capacitance and impedance [86], sensors based on the energy principle [87], sensors based on ultrasonic principle [88]. [84] In view of the development of the on-line condition monitoring sensor technology for lubricating oil, in addition to sensors of the physical and chemical properties of the lubricating oil and the sensors of wear debris, the sensors is also including such as Infrared (IR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry [89]、 XRF (X-ray fluorescence ) sensors [90] 、 Photo-acoustic spectroscopy (PAS) [91] 、 Fluorescence spectroscopy [92] etc..…”
Section: Oil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of sensors exist today for continuous condition monitoring of different oil parameters, and the majority of particle measuring sensors are based on a magnetic or optical measurement principle [6]. Magnetic sensors enable distinction between ferrous and non-ferrous particles [7], and currently exhibit a lower particle size detection limit of around 20 sans-serifμnormalm, depending on sensor design [6]. Optical particle counters (OPCs) based on light extinction are widely used within the industry today, and has been available for use in industrial applications since the 1970s [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the measurement principles, there are two predominant technologies for in-line wear debris sensors: magnetic or inductive detectors and photonic detectors [16,17]. While the magnetic or inductive solutions offer a very good performance for high flow rates, allowing them to monitor large fluid volumes in real time, they suffer some drawbacks in terms of resolution and minimum detectable particle size, and they are affected by electrical noise and vibrations [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%