Introduction Traditional methods of dental undergraduate education were impacted by cross-infection precautions associated with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), necessitating rapid implementation of virtual and novel in-person education strategies. The unprecedented pace at which COVID-19 caused educational disruption required universities to rapidly design and apply novel methods amidst limited clinical learning opportunity.
Objectives To use a scoping review to identify from published literature the educational methods employed globally during the COVID-19 pandemic, to explore stakeholders’ perceptions of their use, and to identify potential future good practise.
Method Scoping review methodology was used to select and analyse 63 articles. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, with inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. Articles were screened at the title and abstract level by one reviewer, and at full text by one reviewer, with supervisory assistance from a second reviewer.
Results Dental education rapidly transitioned to total online learning for theoretical and clinical aspects. A shift to hybrid models followed, employing advanced virtual techniques for theory and in-person clinical training in laboratories and limited patient settings as restrictions eased. Students valued self-directed virtual methods but were concerned about reduced practical training. Hands-on mannequins and patient interactions remained preferable for clinical skills acquisition. Interactive online and in-person activities were highly valued for engagement and feedback, while case-based learning enhanced critical thinking. Virtual exams were accepted for communication and theory evaluation, though in-person assessments were favoured for clinical skills. Teaching staff highlighted the desire for additional IT related training and the development of existing IT infrastructure. Both teachers and learners endorsed blended approaches, combining in-person and virtual methods, for optimised clinical learning exposure.
Conclusions Undergraduate programmes should devise hybrid programmes that harnesses the educational efficacy and technological benefits of both virtual and in-person approaches amidst reduced clinical exposure. This approach ensures that dental graduates attain essential knowledge, competence, and readiness for autonomous practice.