29th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop
DOI: 10.1109/sew.2005.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objectives-Driven Process for Selecting Methods to Support Requirements Engineering Activities

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper presents a framework that guides the requirements engineer in the implementation and execution of an effective requirements generation process. We achieve this goal by providing a well-defined requirements engineering model and a criteria based process for optimizing method selection for attendant activities. Current models address only portions of the requirements process or include activities defined at higher levels of abstraction; this often obscures the implementation aspects of the r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…abstraction level, effort, required skills), are available. They however focus on techniques from other areas, mostly requirements elicitation [15]- [17], but also analysis [18] or validation [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abstraction level, effort, required skills), are available. They however focus on techniques from other areas, mostly requirements elicitation [15]- [17], but also analysis [18] or validation [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Browne et al [15] also proposed guidance for the selection of elicitation technique. Lobo et al [16] developed an approach for elicitation technique selection based on a predefined RE process model. Lausen [18] discusses several techniques, which can be used in the RE process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCBF (Chang et al, 2010 b, c ;2011 a, b , c, d, e, f) VBSPN (Zirpins and Emmerich 2008) DSGE (Etro, 2008) CBM (Klems, Nimis and Tsai, 2009) SLA-based (Assuncao, Costanzo, Buyya et al, 2009) Miscellaneous (Lobo and Arthur, 2005 Need to consider more on quantitative aspects.…”
Section: Types Of Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%