1930
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1930.10880042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Method of Determining Reading Difficulty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1938
1938
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jika semua kondisi disamaratakan, akan terasa sulit untuk mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang diharapkan. Karena pada dasarnya setiap siswa mempunyai karakteristik berbeda termasuk pada teknik belajar dan porsi penyerapan materi pelajaran seperti pada konsep multiple intelligence (Stanford, 2003 (Johnson, 1930…”
Section: Fika Megawati Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Mencapai Pembelajarunclassified
“…Jika semua kondisi disamaratakan, akan terasa sulit untuk mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang diharapkan. Karena pada dasarnya setiap siswa mempunyai karakteristik berbeda termasuk pada teknik belajar dan porsi penyerapan materi pelajaran seperti pada konsep multiple intelligence (Stanford, 2003 (Johnson, 1930…”
Section: Fika Megawati Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Mencapai Pembelajarunclassified
“…Justification for this simpler method can be found in the literature. As early as 1930, Johnson (8) proposed that the per cent of polysyllabic words found in thirty 100-word samples per book could be used as a rough measure for determining the reading difficulty of elementary school textbooks. He showed that a series of geography texts, language texts and readers supposedly adjusted to the levels of each of the elementary school grades ranged from 85 per cent of one syllable words in the first grade to 71 per cent in the eighth grade.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%