2010
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Approach to Dry Eye Disease Severity

Abstract: Tear film osmolarity was found to be the single best marker of disease severity across normal, mild/moderate, and severe categories. Other tests were found to be informative in the more severe forms of disease; thus, clinical judgment remains an important element in the clinical assessment of dry eye severity. The results also indicate that the initiation and progression of dry eye is multifactorial and supports the rationale for redefining severity on the basis of a continuum of clinical signs. (ClinicalTrial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
368
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 460 publications
(396 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
16
368
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in accordance with current literature, where the poor relationships between ocular signs and dry eye symptoms are criticised. [8][9][10][11]19 However, the use of a composite index might have shown a stronger relationship between staining and dry eye severity, as reported by Sullivan et al 63 The classic tests TMH, NIBUT, and PRTT, as well as the new LIPCOF (nasal and temporal) and LWE tests were significant correlated to dry eye symptoms (Table 2), although these correlations varied in their strengths. The relationship between LWE and dry eye symptoms investigated in this study confirms the findings of Korb et al, 15 where LWE was reported to correlate to symptoms as determined by the total Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in accordance with current literature, where the poor relationships between ocular signs and dry eye symptoms are criticised. [8][9][10][11]19 However, the use of a composite index might have shown a stronger relationship between staining and dry eye severity, as reported by Sullivan et al 63 The classic tests TMH, NIBUT, and PRTT, as well as the new LIPCOF (nasal and temporal) and LWE tests were significant correlated to dry eye symptoms (Table 2), although these correlations varied in their strengths. The relationship between LWE and dry eye symptoms investigated in this study confirms the findings of Korb et al, 15 where LWE was reported to correlate to symptoms as determined by the total Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This is in accordance with clinical experience and the published Using a combination of tests has been recommended to improve the predictive ability for dry eye. 9,[12][13][14]63 However, there is no agreement on which tests should be combined and, to our knowledge, it was unknown before this study whether LWE and LIPCOF would be able to help such a combination of tests in non-contact lens wearers. Since a combination of LIPCOF Sum and NIBUT showed an improved predictive ability for later contact lens related dry eye symptoms in naive contact lens wearers, 13 a comparable combination appeared to be obvious in non-contact lens wearers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Participants were individuals with a normal ocular surface by history and examination, according to defined criteria. Following a preliminary visit subjects were screened for the following inclusion criteria: tear osmolarity <308 mOsm/L; 19 OSDI score <20; TBUT >10 seconds and corneal staining < grade 2 using the Oxford clinical grading scale. 20 Subjects were excluded if they had any active ocular disease, any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities (corneal scars or opacities), any clinically significant limbal or bulbar injection or conjunctival staining, any eye surgery or injury within the previous 6 months, any systemic disease affecting ocular health, had nasolacrimal occlusion or were using any topical medications.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,31 However, because not all glaucoma patients would be treated on both eyes, only the treated eye was included in the study. In patients where both eyes were eligible, both eyes were included in the study.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of TFO have been demonstrated to be suitable, and even superior to other forms of tests, in terms of dry eye diagnosis. [17][18][19] Sullivan et al 20 found that TFO measurements are the best indication of dry eye severity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.55, as compared with other clinical tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%