2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2008.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An M/G/1 queue with two phases of service subject to the server breakdown and delayed repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for the single unit arrival case with = 1, the above formula (3.45) is consistent with the result obtained by Choudhury and Tadj [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that for the single unit arrival case with = 1, the above formula (3.45) is consistent with the result obtained by Choudhury and Tadj [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This model can be generalized straight away by considering that the second optional service time is also governed by a general distribution. In this context, recently, Choudhury and Tadj [16] generalized this type of model by introducing the concept of a delay period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Madan (2000) considered the classical M/G/1 queuing system in which the server provides the first essential service (FES) to all the arriving customers whereas some of them receive SOS. The steady state analysis of an M/G/1 queue with repeated attempts and additional second phase of service has been done in different frameworks by Artelejo and Choudhury (2004), Choudhury (2008), and Choudhury and Tadj (2009).…”
Section: Survey Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Wang and Xu (2009) obtained the solution of an M/G/1 queue with second optional service and server breakdown using the method of functional analysis. The work on an M/G/1 queue with second optional service and server breakdown has been done by Choudhury and Tadj (2009). They derived the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of busy period distribution and waiting time distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%