2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7472576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative hard thresholding approach to ℓ<inf>0</inf> sparse Hellinger NMF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PED is related to β-divergence through membership of the αβ divergence family [17], with similar error function scaling e.g. linear scaling is found for β = 2η = 1 [18]. The experiments described in [12] were on a database of MIDI chords, with improved performance observed for PED relative to βdivergence, particularly as η → 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…PED is related to β-divergence through membership of the αβ divergence family [17], with similar error function scaling e.g. linear scaling is found for β = 2η = 1 [18]. The experiments described in [12] were on a database of MIDI chords, with improved performance observed for PED relative to βdivergence, particularly as η → 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Bertin et al [33] propose a tempering scheme favoring NMF with Itakura-Saito divergence to global minima. O'Hanlon and Sandler [34] propose an iterative hard thresholding approach for l 0 sparse NMF problem with Hellinger distance. ERBT spectrograms of polyphonic music pieces are decomposed directly and a pitch salience matrix is calculate to detect active notes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several important instances of Csiszár f -divergence have been used in NMF, including the 1 distance [37] and the family of α-divergences [3], [4]. In particular, the α-divergences include Hellinger distance (α = 1/2) [38], [39] and the (generalized) Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence (α → 1) [40], [41]. Moreover, for these special cases, d…”
Section: B Overview Of Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%