2017
DOI: 10.7456/10704100/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation Through Content Analysis in Infographics

Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate studies and trends in infographics in order to determine the specifications of its scientific content. The study analyzes 161 theoretical and experimental research papers published between 2006 and 2016 through the utilization of both qualitative and quantitative indicators. Citation analysis is used in this research in order to examine studies related to infographics that are indexed in scientific journals. Infographics and data visualization related keywords are jointl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the number of authors is examined in the articles examined about the use of infographic in education, the articles with two authors have the highest percentage as 46.1%, as in Augmented reality technology. Uzunboylu & Beheshti (2017) stated that in their infographic studies in which the number of authors were examined, articles written with more than one author appeared more intensely than single authors supporting the data obtained in this study. Among the methods that include the use of Augmented Reality Technologies in the field of education, the highest percentage of the methods used by the studies is the studies using quantitative methods with the highest rate of 40.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the number of authors is examined in the articles examined about the use of infographic in education, the articles with two authors have the highest percentage as 46.1%, as in Augmented reality technology. Uzunboylu & Beheshti (2017) stated that in their infographic studies in which the number of authors were examined, articles written with more than one author appeared more intensely than single authors supporting the data obtained in this study. Among the methods that include the use of Augmented Reality Technologies in the field of education, the highest percentage of the methods used by the studies is the studies using quantitative methods with the highest rate of 40.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When the distribution of studies on the use of infographics in education is analyzed by years, it is seen that the highest number of studies was conducted in 2018 with 38.4%. Uzunboylu & Beheshti (2017) stated that the highest publishing rate was realized in 2012 in their content analysis on infographic. Based on this result, it was determined that the articles published on Infographics showed a significant increase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is supported by a lack of pedagogical field information when the projects are examined. [30], in their content analysis on infographics, looked at the field of education where infographics were used the most, and it appeared mostly in the odds of information technologies in this study, which supports the result of the study of the content analysis of the teaching themed TÜBITAK projects that are teaching-themed. When examining the types of research referenced in projects, it is observed that the least used method is the design-based research, which is the most mixed method with 14 of the most commonly used methods in the projects.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to the results obtained from the study, it is seen that the least published publication of the year 2018 was made in 2006, while the views of school administrators about technology were examined. (Uzunboylu and Beheshti, 2017), in their content analysis about the infographic, it is seen that the most publication is in 2016. In this study, in which similar years were compared with this study, it was determined that the year of least publication was 2006. the content analysis of master's and doctoral theses in the field of chemistry teaching, he stated that the most published year was 2011, in contrast to the results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%