2016
DOI: 10.22452/mjs.vol35no2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Soil Physico-Chemical Variables Across Different Lowland Forest Ecosystems of Brunei Darussalam

Abstract: Tropical forests undisputedly harbor the largest share of global plant diversity, but the mechanisms of maintenance for this diversity cannot be well understood without good data on environmental variables, primarily soil characteristics. This study investigates differences in soil physico-chemical properties in various tropical lowland forest types in Brunei Darussalam, in the Northwest Borneo plant diversity hotspot. Nine different vegetation types were investigated: intact primary mixed-dipterocarp forest, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of GWC values in the six plots was comparable to values recorded from Kerangas forests in Bukit Sawat and Sungai Mau, Brunei Darussalam [38,39], as well as those observed from Kerangas forests in Brunei and Sarawak [18,40]. The range of pH values we recorded (3.85-4.7) is consistent with 6 International Journal of Ecology those from other Bornean heath forests [19,31,40,41] and Amazonia caatinga [42,43].…”
Section: Do Soil and Environmental Variables Differ Between Plots?supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The range of GWC values in the six plots was comparable to values recorded from Kerangas forests in Bukit Sawat and Sungai Mau, Brunei Darussalam [38,39], as well as those observed from Kerangas forests in Brunei and Sarawak [18,40]. The range of pH values we recorded (3.85-4.7) is consistent with 6 International Journal of Ecology those from other Bornean heath forests [19,31,40,41] and Amazonia caatinga [42,43].…”
Section: Do Soil and Environmental Variables Differ Between Plots?supporting
confidence: 88%
“…10 years, partly co‐dominated by invasive Australian Acacia trees), (d) peat swamp forest, (e) heath forest (kerangas), (f) kerapah forest, intermediate between the former two, (g) matrix mangrove forest, (h) fringe mangrove forest, and (i) island mangroves (see Jaafar et al () for details on the localities).These main forest types in the region (i.e. lowland dipterocarp forest, peat swamp forest, kerangas and mangroves) differ vastly in terms of their soil physico‐chemical characteristics and plant assemblages (Jaafar et al, ; Slik et al, ), while intermediate and disturbed forest types were included to cover a broader spectrum of values for soil variables. Different mangrove forest subtypes have different levels of exposure to seawater, creating microhabitats suitable for diverse animal and plant assemblages (Procheş, Marshall, Ugrasen, & Ramcharan, ; Satyanarayana et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the Central African and Neotropical rain forests are more isolated (Procheş & Ramdhani, 2013). This means that the array (h) fringe mangrove forest, and (i) island mangroves (see Jaafar et al (2016) for details on the localities).These main forest types in the region (i.e. lowland dipterocarp forest, peat swamp forest, kerangas and mangroves) differ vastly in terms of their soil physico-chemical characteristics and plant assemblages (Jaafar et al, 2016;Slik et al, 2009), while intermediate and disturbed forest types were included to cover a broader spectrum of values for soil variables.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations